Amend Communications Act of 1934: Hearings ... Ninety-first Congress, First Session ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969 - 724 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 5 ¨Ò¡ 100
˹éÒ 346
... question of programing contrary to the public interest under the Communications Act and is also a violation of the criminal code . The Supreme Court in 1966 recognized that in judging ob- scenity of a book the methods used by the vendor ...
... question of programing contrary to the public interest under the Communications Act and is also a violation of the criminal code . The Supreme Court in 1966 recognized that in judging ob- scenity of a book the methods used by the vendor ...
˹éÒ 347
... question , whereas in the broadcast area we rely on the criminal statute . We present these cases to the Department of Justice who invariably fail to prose- cute . They will feel under the Supreme Court standards they could not sustain ...
... question , whereas in the broadcast area we rely on the criminal statute . We present these cases to the Department of Justice who invariably fail to prose- cute . They will feel under the Supreme Court standards they could not sustain ...
˹éÒ 348
... question . I asked you , would you read it ? Mr. Cox . Yes . Senator PASTORE . Would you read it to your 16 - year - old daughter ? Mr. Cox . I do not happen to have one . I do not know whether I would . But I may say that I listened to ...
... question . I asked you , would you read it ? Mr. Cox . Yes . Senator PASTORE . Would you read it to your 16 - year - old daughter ? Mr. Cox . I do not happen to have one . I do not know whether I would . But I may say that I listened to ...
˹éÒ 349
... question there were two professors of literature and one professor of clinical psychology . The two professors of literature , both of whom were practicing Catho- lics , found the poem in good taste . They were also citing analysis by ...
... question there were two professors of literature and one professor of clinical psychology . The two professors of literature , both of whom were practicing Catho- lics , found the poem in good taste . They were also citing analysis by ...
˹éÒ 350
... question here is not really one of obscenity . Obscenity is a very narrow legal concept . I think the real question here is that people are offended by the language used . I think that the use of offensive language is a matter of taste ...
... question here is not really one of obscenity . Obscenity is a very narrow legal concept . I think the real question here is that people are offended by the language used . I think that the use of offensive language is a matter of taste ...
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
airwaves amendment ARENSMEIER BANZHAF BANZHAF III believe better Boston broadcast license broadcast stations broadcasting industry Chairman challenge channels Church of Christ citizens Commissioner committee Communications Act comparative hearing competing applications competitive complaints CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Court existing licensee Fairness Doctrine Federal Communications Commission filed going Government grant groups investment issue KTAL KTAL-TV legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS license renewal LOEVINGER MARTIN-TRIGONA mass media matter National needs networks newspaper obscenity Office of Communication operation ownership Pacifica Pastore bill performance petition to deny present President problem procedure profit protect public interest public service question radio and television radio stations record regulation renewal application renewal proceeding responsibility Reverend PARKER Senator GURNEY Senator PASTORE serve the public standards statement Subcommittee television stations thing tion U.S. Senate United Church Washington WHDH rule WHDH-TV WHEC-TV WKXL WLBT WNBC-TV WPIX
º·¤ÇÒÁ·Õèà»ç¹·Õè¹ÔÂÁ
˹éÒ 406 - Because of the scarcity of radio frequencies, the Government is permitted to put restraints on licensees in favor of others whose views should be expressed on this unique medium. But the people as a whole retain their interest in free speech by radio and their collective right to have the medium function consistently with the ends and purposes of the First Amendment. It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount.
˹éÒ 521 - In considering applications for licenses, and modifications and renewals thereof, when and insofar as there is demand for the same, the Commission shall make such distribution of licenses, frequencies, hours of operation, and of power among the several states and communities as to provide a fair, efficient and equitable distribution of radio service to each of the same.
˹éÒ 369 - If the First Amendment means anything, it means that a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch.
˹éÒ 612 - If all mankind, minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.
˹éÒ 612 - If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change it's republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated, where reason is left free to combat it.
˹éÒ 614 - Amendment rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society.
˹éÒ 717 - To condition the granting or renewal of licenses on a willingness to present representative community views on controversial issues is consistent with the ends and purposes of those constitutional provisions forbidding the abridgment of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
˹éÒ 614 - Surely a command that the government itself shall not impede the free flow of ideas does not afford non-governmental combinations a refuge if they impose restraints upon that constitutionally guaranteed freedom. Freedom to publish means freedom for all and not for some. Freedom to publish is guaranteed by the Constitution, but freedom to combine to keep others from publishing is not. Freedom of the press from governmental interference under the First Amendment does not sanction repression of that...
˹éÒ 359 - Whoever utters any obscene, indecent, or profane language by means of radio communication shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
˹éÒ 457 - It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here.