Deviance and Medicalization, from Badness to Sickness"The subject of this book is the gradual social transformation of deviance designations in American society from "badness" to "sickness." This has been the most profound change in the definition of deviance in the past two centuries. By examining the medicalization (and demedicalization) of deviance in American society, we may also investigate the general sociohistorical process of defining deviance. Thus this book has a dual focus: it is a historical and sociological inquiry into the changing definitions of deviance and an analysis of the transformation from religious and criminal to medical designations and control of deviance." -- preface. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 68
˹éÒ vi
The hara - kiri of the traditional Japanese ritual suicide seems understandable to Western minds who have come to know something of Japanese history and culture . In view of the fact that the members of the People's Temple were isolated ...
The hara - kiri of the traditional Japanese ritual suicide seems understandable to Western minds who have come to know something of Japanese history and culture . In view of the fact that the members of the People's Temple were isolated ...
˹éÒ 26
This , however , does not negate the fact that arguments of etiology may be in essence jurisdictional disputes ( this is perhaps clearest in the case of opiate addiction , presented in Chapter 5 ) . As Erich Goode ( 1969 ) points out ...
This , however , does not negate the fact that arguments of etiology may be in essence jurisdictional disputes ( this is perhaps clearest in the case of opiate addiction , presented in Chapter 5 ) . As Erich Goode ( 1969 ) points out ...
˹éÒ 31
The fact that there is high agreement on what constitutes an illness does not change this . ... on what “ objectively ” is disease is not independent of the social consensus that constructs these “ facts ” and renders them “ important .
The fact that there is high agreement on what constitutes an illness does not change this . ... on what “ objectively ” is disease is not independent of the social consensus that constructs these “ facts ” and renders them “ important .
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅ觢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Deviance definitions and the medical profession | 1 |
changing designations of deviance | 17 |
Deviance illness and medicalization | 28 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
9 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
accepted activities addiction alcohol American analysis appears approach argued Association attempt became become behavior believed called cause century chapter child child abuse claims clinics concept concern condition conduct considered court created crime criminal critics cultural cure defined definitions delinquency designations deviance deviant behavior discussion disease dominant drinking drug early effects emerged evidence example exist fact groups homosexuality hospitals human idea important increased individual institutions interest involved largely less madness major means medicine ment mental illness methadone moral nature opiate opium organization particular patients persons physical physicians political practice present problem profession professional programs psychiatric published punishment question recent response result role scientific seen sexual sick social control society specific success suggests theory tion treat treatment United York
ºÃóҹءÃÁ
| ª×èÍ˹ѧÊ×Í | Deviance and Medicalization, from Badness to Sickness |
| ¼Ùéà¢Õ¹ | Peter Conrad, Joseph W. Schneider |
| ©ºÑº | ©ºÑº·ÕèÁÕÀÒ¾»ÃСͺ |
| ¼Ùé¨Ñ´¾ÔÁ¾ì | Mosby, 1980 |
| µé¹©ºÑºÁÒ¨Ò¡ | University of Michigan |
| á»Å§à»ç¹¢éÍÁÙÅ´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ | 23 Ê.¤. 2007 |
| ISBN | 0801610257, 9780801610257 |
| ¤ÇÒÁÂÒÇ | 311 ˹éÒ |
| Êè§ÍÍ¡¡ÒÃÍéÒ§ÍÔ§ | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |