Educational Development: Discourse, Identity and PracticeMcGraw-Hill Education (UK), 1 พ.ย. 2004 - 218 หน้า This first book-length analysis of developers as a community of practice illustrates in their own words the issues they face, their differing orientations to development (given their differing organisational cultures), and how they see their institutional role. What emerges is the contested notion of ‘development’ itself, and a tribe of developers who, though fragmented, offer a rich variation in their discourse, identity and practice. |
เนื้อหา
Introduction | 1 |
Chapter 01 Orientations to Educational Development | 12 |
Chapter 02 Stances on Change | 129 |
The Educational Developer and Academic Cultures | 161 |
Postscript | 191 |
Educational development and modernism | 192 |
Community diversity and fracture | 193 |
Vocation and professional status | 196 |
| 200 | |
| 209 | |
SHRE | 217 |
Back Cover | 219 |
ฉบับอื่นๆ - ดูทั้งหมด
คำและวลีที่พบบ่อย
academic actually adhocracy Alvesson approach argues assessment can’t cational development cognitive Cognitive Psychology colleagues collegial Committee community of practice competence concept conflict context course curriculum defined definition difficult disciplinary discipline discipline-specific discourse educational development units effective emphasis Entrepreneurial environment field find finding first going hermeneutic higher education I’ve identified important individual influence influential innovation institution interested Interviewer involved issue kind managerial managerialist mean ment metaphor notion operate organization organizational culture orientations to educational perspective political postmodern problems professional programme rational reflective Research Assessment Exercise Respondent 12 Respondent 27 role SEDA seen senior management sense sensemaking significant social specific staff development stances strategic structure sufficient talk teachers teaching and learning theory there’s they’re things tion understanding values we’re Webb what’s you’re you’ve