Rational Extremism: The Political Economy of Radicalism

ปกหน้า
Cambridge University Press, 14 ส.ค. 2006
Extremists are people whose ideas or tactics are viewed as outside the mainstream. Looked at this way, extremists are not necessarily twisted or evil. But they can be, especially when they are intolerant and violent. What makes extremists turn violent? This 2006 book assumes that extremists are rational: given their ends, they choose the best means to achieve them. The analysis explains why extremist leaders use the tactics they do, and why they are often insensitive to punishment and to loss of life. It also explains how rational people can be motivated to die for the cause. The book covers different aspects of extremism such as revolution, suicide terrorism, and global jihad. The arguments are illustrated with important episodes of extremism, including the French Revolution, the rise of nationalism in Yugoslavia under Milosevic, and the emergence of suicide terror and Al Qaeda today.

จากด้านในหนังสือ

เนื้อหา

เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 1
3
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 2
21
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 3
53
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 4
75
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 5
89
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 6
90
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 7
94
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 8
99
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 11
123
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 12
137
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 13
139
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 14
144
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 15
161
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 16
190
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 17
215
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 18
228

เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 9
108
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 10
118
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 19
230
เลขส่วนเนื้อหา 20
245

ฉบับอื่นๆ - ดูทั้งหมด

คำและวลีที่พบบ่อย

บทความที่เป็นที่นิยม

หน้า 76 - I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be selfevident; that all men are created equal.
หน้า 76 - I have a dream that one day even the State of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice. I have a dream...
หน้า 77 - Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you.
หน้า 37 - We have said that there could not yet be Social-Democratic consciousness among the workers. It could only be brought to them from without. The history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own effort, is able to develop only trade union consciousness...
หน้า 77 - Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice— or will we be extremists for the cause of justice? In that dramatic scene on Calvary's hill three men were crucified. We must never forget that all three were crucified for the same crime— the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thus fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth, and goodness, and thereby rose above His environment.
หน้า 77 - I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus." Was not Martin Luther an extremist: "Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God." And John Bunyan: "I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience.
หน้า 37 - The history of all countries shows that the working class, exclusively by its own effort, is able to develop only trade union consciousness, ie, the conviction that it is necessary to combine in unions, fight the employers, and strive to compel the government to pass necessary labour legislation, etc.
หน้า 77 - I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience." And Abraham Lincoln : "This nation cannot survive half slave and half free." And Thomas Jefferson : "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal . . ." So the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be.
หน้า 153 - Catholicism, it is because it has fewer common beliefs and practices. Now, a religious society cannot ^ exist without a collective credo and the more extensive the credo the more unified and strong is the society. For it does not unite men by an exchange and reciprocity of services, a temporal bond of union which permits and even presupposes differences, but which a religious society cannot form. It socializes men only by attaching them completely to an identical body of doctrine and socializes them...

ข้อมูลอ้างอิงหนังสือเล่มนี้

Macht in der Ökonomie
Martin Held
ไม่มีตัวอย่าง - 2008

บรรณานุกรม