| J.T. Cushing, Arthur Fine, S. Goldstein - 1996 - 420 หน้า
..."reality". Thus, our difficulties are not surprising in the light of the words of Bell (1987a, 128): "No one can understand this theory until he is willing to think of \|/ as a real objective field rather than just a 'probability amplitude'." Although we are certainly... | |
| Jeffrey Bub - 1999 - 312 หน้า
...the evolution of \l/ in configuration space. As Bell puts it (1987, p. 128; italics in the original): No one can understand this theory until he is willing to think offy as a real objective field rather than just a 'probability amplitude'. Even though it propagates... | |
| J. S. Bell, Mary Bell, Kurt Gottfried, Martinus Veltman - 2001 - 252 หน้า
...fields of classical Maxwell theory - although its action on the particles, (4.6), is rather original. So one can understand this theory until he is willing to think of 4» as a real objective field rather than just a 'probability amplitude', even though it propagates... | |
| J. S. Bell - 2004 - 292 หน้า
...fields of classical Maxwell theory - although its action on the particles, (7), is rather original. No one can understand this theory until he is willing to think of\l/ as a real objective field rather than just a 'probability amplitude'. Even though it propagates... | |
| Gonzalo Muga, R. Sala Mayato, Inigo Egusquiza - 2007 - 461 หน้า
...ontological meaning." This echoes a statement made about Bohmian mechanics by Bell in Chap. 15 of [6]: "No one can understand this theory until he is willing...field rather than just a \probability amplitude'. Even though it propagates not in 3— space but in 3TV— space." I see no reason why an extremely... | |
| |