On DialogueRoutledge, 13 ¾.¤. 2013 - 144 ˹éÒ Never before has there been a greater need for deeper listening and more open communication to cope with the complex problems facing our organizations, businesses and societies. Renowned scientist David Bohm believed there was a better way for humanity to discover meaning and to achieve harmony. He identified creative dialogue, a sharing of assumptions and understanding, as a means by which the individual, and society as a whole, can learn more about themselves and others, and achieve a renewed sense of purpose. |
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
absolutely necessary abstraction activity actually anger angry attention aware become begin body Bohm’s brain can’t chimpanzee coherent collective communication confusion consciousness couldn’t create creative culture David Bohm defend dialogue group didn’t difficulties emerge everything example experience fact feeling frustration give goes green movement happens hate human race idea implicate order important impulse incoherence individual kind of thought Krishnamurti limited listen literal thought look mind move movement nature necessity need is love negotiate neurophysiology notion observer one’s paradox partaking participation participatory thought Patrick de Mare perception perhaps person pollution possible present problem process of thought produce proprioception question reflexes relationship religion representation says Bohm scientists sense sensitive shared meaning society solve sorts of things stick subtle suggest suspend tacit ground tacit knowledge tacit process talk there’s thought process tion truth trying unlimited we’re what’s going word you’re Zionism