Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 หน้า |
จากด้านในหนังสือ
ผลการค้นหา 1 - 3 จาก 12
หน้า 119
... ANOVA . The difference was significant in the predicted direction ( see Table 6 ) . While there is then , some evidence that MJP is more influential amongst C - GMP Ss against ingroup than outgroup members , MJP is nonetheless a very ...
... ANOVA . The difference was significant in the predicted direction ( see Table 6 ) . While there is then , some evidence that MJP is more influential amongst C - GMP Ss against ingroup than outgroup members , MJP is nonetheless a very ...
หน้า 232
... ANOVA for the pull of MIP + MD on MJP ( representing Factor 1 , ingroup bias in evaluations of the groups ' performance ) Analysis of variance Source d.f. MS A ( SS / US ) I 0.22 B ( Leg./Illeg . ) I 24:44 F 0.05 5.72 p < 0.05 C ( H.S. ...
... ANOVA for the pull of MIP + MD on MJP ( representing Factor 1 , ingroup bias in evaluations of the groups ' performance ) Analysis of variance Source d.f. MS A ( SS / US ) I 0.22 B ( Leg./Illeg . ) I 24:44 F 0.05 5.72 p < 0.05 C ( H.S. ...
หน้า 324
... ANOVA showed that there were no significant differences between groups in the absolute levels of common sense which they attributed to the supporters of their own team , but there were significant differences between groups in their ...
... ANOVA showed that there were no significant differences between groups in the absolute levels of common sense which they attributed to the supporters of their own team , but there were significant differences between groups in their ...
เนื้อหา
Contributors | 1 |
2 Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 45 |
Social Categorization Social Identity and Social | 61 |
ลิขสิทธิ์ | |
18 เนื้อหาอื่นๆ ไม่ได้แสดงไว้
คำและวลีที่พบบ่อย
accentuation analysis analysis of variance attributes booklet boys Chapter characteristics choices cognitive alternatives competition concerned conflict consensus context creativity criteria described dimension discussed distinctiveness Doise dominant group effects ethnic groups ethnocentrism ethnolinguistic evaluation example existing experiment experimental conditions factors favour Giles girls group members group membership HENRI TAJFEL Hutu hypotheses illegitimacy important individual ingroup bias ingroup favouritism interaction intergroup behaviour intergroup differentiation intergroup discrimination intergroup relations interindividual interpersonal L.S. group language Lemaine linguistic markers matrices means minimal MIP+MD one's perceived positive predictions present psychological questionnaire ratings reference relationship relative relevant responses scores self-favouritism significant similar social categorization social change social comparison social groups social identity social psychology social situation speech status differences status group strategies structure subjects superior group supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threatened Tutsi University of Bristol unthreatened values variables