Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 12
˹éÒ 126
... choices , there was a slight difference between the SO - OO and OO - SO conditions . All Ss have received the same " groupness cues " ( as such explicit references to group membership have been termed by Dann , 1972 ) when they make ...
... choices , there was a slight difference between the SO - OO and OO - SO conditions . All Ss have received the same " groupness cues " ( as such explicit references to group membership have been termed by Dann , 1972 ) when they make ...
˹éÒ 127
... OO choices but only nos 7 and 9 were used in the SO choices . The strengths of each variable were measured in the same way as for Experiment I ; the raw data are the mean pulls of each variable for each subject . The pull of MIP / MS ...
... OO choices but only nos 7 and 9 were used in the SO choices . The strengths of each variable were measured in the same way as for Experiment I ; the raw data are the mean pulls of each variable for each subject . The pull of MIP / MS ...
˹éÒ 130
... of the choices and whether they are made before or after OO choices . The pull of MD is significantly stronger in SOV than SOM choices ( Table 10 ) . There is also an interaction between the B / A and M / V factors in this strategy ...
... of the choices and whether they are made before or after OO choices . The pull of MD is significantly stronger in SOV than SOM choices ( Table 10 ) . There is also an interaction between the B / A and M / V factors in this strategy ...
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
2 Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 45 |
Social Categorization Social Identity and Social | 61 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
18 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
accentuation analysis analysis of variance attributes booklet boys Chapter characteristics choices cognitive alternatives competition concerned conflict consensus context creativity criteria described dimension discussed distinctiveness Doise dominant group effects ethnic groups ethnocentrism ethnolinguistic evaluation example existing experiment experimental conditions factors favour Giles girls group members group membership HENRI TAJFEL Hutu hypotheses illegitimacy important individual ingroup bias ingroup favouritism interaction intergroup behaviour intergroup differentiation intergroup discrimination intergroup relations interindividual interpersonal L.S. group language Lemaine linguistic markers matrices means minimal MIP+MD one's perceived positive predictions present psychological questionnaire ratings reference relationship relative relevant responses scores self-favouritism significant similar social categorization social change social comparison social groups social identity social psychology social situation speech status differences status group strategies structure subjects superior group supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threatened Tutsi University of Bristol unthreatened values variables