Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 77
˹éÒ 115
If his former score were 3 and his latter 8 ( see Table 4 ( a ) and ( b ) ) , then the
pull of MS + MD would be 5 . In other words , moving optimal MS + MD away from
optimal MJP , has shifted his response 5 ranks or boxes . The pulls of other ...
If his former score were 3 and his latter 8 ( see Table 4 ( a ) and ( b ) ) , then the
pull of MS + MD would be 5 . In other words , moving optimal MS + MD away from
optimal MJP , has shifted his response 5 ranks or boxes . The pulls of other ...
˹éÒ 152
and girls without taking into account marks attributed to oneself ( see Table 3 ) .
For groups which had been in the CC condition , means were also calculated of
marks attributed to others who belonged to the four groups ( same sex and colour
...
and girls without taking into account marks attributed to oneself ( see Table 3 ) .
For groups which had been in the CC condition , means were also calculated of
marks attributed to others who belonged to the four groups ( same sex and colour
...
˹éÒ 166
Next to each of the eight traits on each scale , TABLE 4 The questionnaire ( 1 )
Économes ( 2 ) Sérieux ( 3 ) Sceptiques ( 4 ) Sévères ( 5 ) Contractes ( 6 ) Actifs (
7 ) Tenaces ( 8 ) Avares ( 9 ) Entêtés ( 10 ) Énergiques ( 11 ) Pleins de tact ( 12 )
...
Next to each of the eight traits on each scale , TABLE 4 The questionnaire ( 1 )
Économes ( 2 ) Sérieux ( 3 ) Sceptiques ( 4 ) Sévères ( 5 ) Contractes ( 6 ) Actifs (
7 ) Tenaces ( 8 ) Avares ( 9 ) Entêtés ( 10 ) Énergiques ( 11 ) Pleins de tact ( 12 )
...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
Some Effects of Marginal Social Identity | 13 |
Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 27 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
20 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
analysis aspects attempt attributes behaviour boys Chapter characteristics choices comparative comparison competition concerned considered consists create creativity criteria defined described differences differentiation dimension direction discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects ethnic evaluation example existing expected experiment experimental fact factors favour findings forms girls group membership higher hypothesis important increase individual inferior ingroup favouritism interaction interest intergroup involved kind language less majority matrix means measure minority nature objective one's outgroup perceived performance positive possible predictions present problems processes psychological questions ratings reasons reference relations relationship relative relevant reported represented respect responses rewards scores seems significant similar situation social comparison social identity status status group strategies structure subjects suggest superior supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threat values variables