Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 6
˹éÒ 77
... or expressing preference for the paintings of one of two fairly abstract painters ,
Klee and Kandinsky ) . They then worked The Achievement of Group
Differentiation H TAJFEL The “minimal” intergroup experiments and “real” social
contexts.
... or expressing preference for the paintings of one of two fairly abstract painters ,
Klee and Kandinsky ) . They then worked The Achievement of Group
Differentiation H TAJFEL The “minimal” intergroup experiments and “real” social
contexts.
˹éÒ 139
The idea based on this hypothesis that an abstract evaluative dimension would
serve as a perfectly adequate vehicle for discrimination has been confirmed .
marThirdly , the distinction between E ' s classification of Ss into two Care sunt ...
The idea based on this hypothesis that an abstract evaluative dimension would
serve as a perfectly adequate vehicle for discrimination has been confirmed .
marThirdly , the distinction between E ' s classification of Ss into two Care sunt ...
˹éÒ 181
Of course , most of the remaining items were also inserted in the The first
category of items was labelled SCIENTIFIC , and contained the following set of
nine characteristics : scientific , theoretical , abstract thinking , general education
...
Of course , most of the remaining items were also inserted in the The first
category of items was labelled SCIENTIFIC , and contained the following set of
nine characteristics : scientific , theoretical , abstract thinking , general education
...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
Some Effects of Marginal Social Identity | 13 |
Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 27 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
20 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
analysis aspects attempt attributes behaviour boys Chapter characteristics choices comparative comparison competition concerned considered consists create creativity criteria defined described differences differentiation dimension direction discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects ethnic evaluation example existing expected experiment experimental fact factors favour findings forms girls group membership higher hypothesis important increase individual inferior ingroup favouritism interaction interest intergroup involved kind language less majority matrix means measure minority nature objective one's outgroup perceived performance positive possible predictions present problems processes psychological questions ratings reasons reference relations relationship relative relevant reported represented respect responses rewards scores seems significant similar situation social comparison social identity status status group strategies structure subjects suggest superior supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threat values variables