Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 5
˹éÒ 108
... comprehensive school in Bristol . The study was conducted in a classroom of
the boys ' school in three separate sessions of 10 Ss each — 108 J . TURNER
Introduction Experiment I: Social categorization, personal gain ingroup
favouritism.
... comprehensive school in Bristol . The study was conducted in a classroom of
the boys ' school in three separate sessions of 10 Ss each — 108 J . TURNER
Introduction Experiment I: Social categorization, personal gain ingroup
favouritism.
˹éÒ 109
school in three separate sessions of 10 Ss each — corresponding to three
experimental conditions ( see below ) . The first part of the procedure was
identical for all Ss . The Ss were spaced out at separate desks in the classroom
and told that ...
school in three separate sessions of 10 Ss each — corresponding to three
experimental conditions ( see below ) . The first part of the procedure was
identical for all Ss . The Ss were spaced out at separate desks in the classroom
and told that ...
˹éÒ 112
Thus he has no way of knowing , for instance , whether his real classroom friends
are in his own minimal group or not . In addition , there is no social interaction
between Ss , although there is visual contact between the Ss as individuals .
Thus he has no way of knowing , for instance , whether his real classroom friends
are in his own minimal group or not . In addition , there is no social interaction
between Ss , although there is visual contact between the Ss as individuals .
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
Some Effects of Marginal Social Identity | 13 |
Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 27 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
20 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
analysis aspects attempt attributes behaviour boys Chapter characteristics choices comparative comparison competition concerned considered consists create creativity criteria defined described differences differentiation dimension direction discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects ethnic evaluation example existing expected experiment experimental fact factors favour findings forms girls group membership higher hypothesis important increase individual inferior ingroup favouritism interaction interest intergroup involved kind language less majority matrix means measure minority nature objective one's outgroup perceived performance positive possible predictions present problems processes psychological questions ratings reasons reference relations relationship relative relevant reported represented respect responses rewards scores seems significant similar situation social comparison social identity status status group strategies structure subjects suggest superior supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threat values variables