Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 84
˹éÒ 128
According to hypothesis 2 the " points ” ( V ) dimension should serve as an
adequate continuum for social comparison — since it permits evaluative
differentiations — therefore there should be intergroup discrimination in OOV
choices .
According to hypothesis 2 the " points ” ( V ) dimension should serve as an
adequate continuum for social comparison — since it permits evaluative
differentiations — therefore there should be intergroup discrimination in OOV
choices .
˹éÒ 197
wants the group of which he is ( and expects to remain ) a member to differ from
certain other groups on positively valued dimensions . It has , in retrospect ,
become evident that the statement above does not determine the evaluations of ...
wants the group of which he is ( and expects to remain ) a member to differ from
certain other groups on positively valued dimensions . It has , in retrospect ,
become evident that the statement above does not determine the evaluations of ...
˹éÒ 284
To innovate while still trying to remain within the old dimensions is not easy and it
is better , given , for example , the ... Indeed , the strategic importance of a new
dimension is not immediately apprehended by those in a dominant position , for ...
To innovate while still trying to remain within the old dimensions is not easy and it
is better , given , for example , the ... Indeed , the strategic importance of a new
dimension is not immediately apprehended by those in a dominant position , for ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
Some Effects of Marginal Social Identity | 13 |
Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 27 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
20 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
analysis aspects attempt attributes behaviour boys Chapter characteristics choices comparative comparison competition concerned considered consists create creativity criteria defined described differences differentiation dimension direction discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects ethnic evaluation example existing expected experiment experimental fact factors favour findings forms girls group membership higher hypothesis important increase individual inferior ingroup favouritism interaction interest intergroup involved kind language less majority matrix means measure minority nature objective one's outgroup perceived performance positive possible predictions present problems processes psychological questions ratings reasons reference relations relationship relative relevant reported represented respect responses rewards scores seems significant similar situation social comparison social identity status status group strategies structure subjects suggest superior supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threat values variables