Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 49
˹éÒ 12
They provide some evidence that , in some conditions , both forms of
differentiation increase or decrease simultaneously ; but this evidence remains
indirect . However , the important contributions of the studies by Doise and
Deschamps ...
They provide some evidence that , in some conditions , both forms of
differentiation increase or decrease simultaneously ; but this evidence remains
indirect . However , the important contributions of the studies by Doise and
Deschamps ...
˹éÒ 176
Some evidence for the assumption of higher relevance of the intergroup
comparison to the lower status subjects is provided by an experiment of
Branthwaite and Jones ( 1975 ) . These authors studied discrimination in
awarding money to ...
Some evidence for the assumption of higher relevance of the intergroup
comparison to the lower status subjects is provided by an experiment of
Branthwaite and Jones ( 1975 ) . These authors studied discrimination in
awarding money to ...
˹éÒ 232
There is then evidence that all the manipulations were successful . Furthermore ,
the independent ... It is worth noting also that there is no evidence at all for an
interaction between SS / US and Leg . / Illeg . in perceived legitimacy ( SS / US X
...
There is then evidence that all the manipulations were successful . Furthermore ,
the independent ... It is worth noting also that there is no evidence at all for an
interaction between SS / US and Leg . / Illeg . in perceived legitimacy ( SS / US X
...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
Some Effects of Marginal Social Identity | 13 |
Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 27 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
20 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
analysis aspects attempt attributes behaviour boys Chapter characteristics choices comparative comparison competition concerned considered consists create creativity criteria defined described differences differentiation dimension direction discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects ethnic evaluation example existing expected experiment experimental fact factors favour findings forms girls group membership higher hypothesis important increase individual inferior ingroup favouritism interaction interest intergroup involved kind language less majority matrix means measure minority nature objective one's outgroup perceived performance positive possible predictions present problems processes psychological questions ratings reasons reference relations relationship relative relevant reported represented respect responses rewards scores seems significant similar situation social comparison social identity status status group strategies structure subjects suggest superior supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threat values variables