Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 55
˹éÒ 114
the matrices were measured in terms of the influence of particular strategies on
the Ss ' distribution of money . The different matrix - types are designed to
measure the strengths or “ pulls " of different strategies or variables on the Ss '
choices .
the matrices were measured in terms of the influence of particular strategies on
the Ss ' distribution of money . The different matrix - types are designed to
measure the strengths or “ pulls " of different strategies or variables on the Ss '
choices .
˹éÒ 229
CREATIVITY MEASURES The second booklet also contained the creativity
questions . ... disagreed or agreed that the use of this kind of task to measure
reasoning skills represented an unfair advantage for the H . S . group ( fair
advantage ) .
CREATIVITY MEASURES The second booklet also contained the creativity
questions . ... disagreed or agreed that the use of this kind of task to measure
reasoning skills represented an unfair advantage for the H . S . group ( fair
advantage ) .
˹éÒ 230
with status difference variable by subtracting L . S . Ss ' scores on the latter
measure from 100 and this extra measure was included . Finally , MIP + MD on F
was omitted since an estimate of MIP + MD ( on MJP ) was already available .
with status difference variable by subtracting L . S . Ss ' scores on the latter
measure from 100 and this extra measure was included . Finally , MIP + MD on F
was omitted since an estimate of MIP + MD ( on MJP ) was already available .
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
Some Effects of Marginal Social Identity | 13 |
Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 27 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
20 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
analysis aspects attempt attributes behaviour boys Chapter characteristics choices comparative comparison competition concerned considered consists create creativity criteria defined described differences differentiation dimension direction discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects ethnic evaluation example existing expected experiment experimental fact factors favour findings forms girls group membership higher hypothesis important increase individual inferior ingroup favouritism interaction interest intergroup involved kind language less majority matrix means measure minority nature objective one's outgroup perceived performance positive possible predictions present problems processes psychological questions ratings reasons reference relations relationship relative relevant reported represented respect responses rewards scores seems significant similar situation social comparison social identity status status group strategies structure subjects suggest superior supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threat values variables