Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 95
˹éÒ 209
The experiment : Legitimacy and stability in intergroup relations What factors in a
status relationship create an awareness of cognitive alternatives ? Tajfel ' s
answer ( see Chapter 2 ) is that this is based on the perceived illegitimacy of the ...
The experiment : Legitimacy and stability in intergroup relations What factors in a
status relationship create an awareness of cognitive alternatives ? Tajfel ' s
answer ( see Chapter 2 ) is that this is based on the perceived illegitimacy of the ...
˹éÒ 210
The study used the group ' s anticipated performance on a task as the basic
status dimension : H . S . groups were those who expected to do better than the
others . Competition - defined as seeking ingroup superiority on the status
dimension ...
The study used the group ' s anticipated performance on a task as the basic
status dimension : H . S . groups were those who expected to do better than the
others . Competition - defined as seeking ingroup superiority on the status
dimension ...
˹éÒ 237
Festinger ( 1954 ) suggests that differences between individuals on an evaluative
dimension of performance can be conceptualized as status differences and
argues that comparability between individuals decreases directly as status ...
Festinger ( 1954 ) suggests that differences between individuals on an evaluative
dimension of performance can be conceptualized as status differences and
argues that comparability between individuals decreases directly as status ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
Some Effects of Marginal Social Identity | 13 |
Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 27 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
20 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
analysis aspects attempt attributes behaviour boys Chapter characteristics choices comparative comparison competition concerned considered consists create creativity criteria defined described differences differentiation dimension direction discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects ethnic evaluation example existing expected experiment experimental fact factors favour findings forms girls group membership higher hypothesis important increase individual inferior ingroup favouritism interaction interest intergroup involved kind language less majority matrix means measure minority nature objective one's outgroup perceived performance positive possible predictions present problems processes psychological questions ratings reasons reference relations relationship relative relevant reported represented respect responses rewards scores seems significant similar situation social comparison social identity status status group strategies structure subjects suggest superior supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threat values variables