Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup RelationsEuropean Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press, 1978 - 474 ˹éÒ |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 78
˹éÒ 53
In one sense , the simplest case is when a rigid social stratification , on whatever
criteria it may be based , is reflected in the image that the members of various
groups in a social system have of the system ' s structure and its organization .
In one sense , the simplest case is when a rigid social stratification , on whatever
criteria it may be based , is reflected in the image that the members of various
groups in a social system have of the system ' s structure and its organization .
˹éÒ 302
The resulting incompatibility is of interest because it can generate new group
structures : for example , the imprisoned law - breakers who are rejected by the ...
The structure of the powerful group is untouchable : convicts cannot even vote .
The resulting incompatibility is of interest because it can generate new group
structures : for example , the imprisoned law - breakers who are rejected by the ...
The structure of the powerful group is untouchable : convicts cannot even vote .
˹éÒ 402
were now to be regarded as equivalent to the same categories in D . They were
not blind to the strings ” attached to the new structure ; but with their previous
experience of job evaluation - an integral part of any piece - work system — they
felt ...
were now to be regarded as equivalent to the same categories in D . They were
not blind to the strings ” attached to the new structure ; but with their previous
experience of job evaluation - an integral part of any piece - work system — they
felt ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Contributors | 1 |
Some Effects of Marginal Social Identity | 13 |
Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup | 27 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
20 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
analysis aspects attempt attributes behaviour boys Chapter characteristics choices comparative comparison competition concerned considered consists create creativity criteria defined described differences differentiation dimension direction discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects ethnic evaluation example existing expected experiment experimental fact factors favour findings forms girls group membership higher hypothesis important increase individual inferior ingroup favouritism interaction interest intergroup involved kind language less majority matrix means measure minority nature objective one's outgroup perceived performance positive possible predictions present problems processes psychological questions ratings reasons reference relations relationship relative relevant reported represented respect responses rewards scores seems significant similar situation social comparison social identity status status group strategies structure subjects suggest superior supporters Table Tajfel theoretical theory threat values variables