Effective Interprofessional Education: Argument, Assumption and Evidence (Promoting Partnership for Health)

˹
This volume presents a systematic review of interprofessional education in health and social care. This is accompanied by a wider-ranging critique of interprofessional education, grounded by experience, and informed by sources beyond the evaluations that qualified for inclusion in the review. Synthesising the evidence base for interprofessional education nevertheless remains central, with 353 studies surveyed in the first instance, from which 107 studies form the basis for the final analysis.


The book does much more than amass evidence. It revisits conventional wisdom; setting an agenda to help interested parties perform better by applying lessons learned, remedying weaknesses and renewing efforts to address unanswered questions. The first three chapters set the scene for the systematic review and its findings. The middle section of the book articulates the findings of the review. Finally, the closing chapters consider values and attitudes, theoretical perspectives and offer conclusions.


Arguments, assumptions and evidence in this publication are presented to inform policy making, programme planning, teaching and research.

Դ繨ҡ - ¹Ԩó

辺Ԩó 觢ŷ

Ѻ - ٷ

ǡѺ (2005)

Hugh Barr and Ivan Koppel, both University of Westminster, School of Integrated Health, London, UK

Scott Reeves, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Marilyn Hammick, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK

Della Freeth, City University, London, UK


óҹء