ÀҾ˹éÒ˹ѧÊ×Í
PDF
ePub

CHAPTER XXVI

THE SUBJECTION OF WIVES

AMONG the lower races, as a rule, a woman is always more or less in a state of dependence. When she is emancipated by marriage from the power of her father, she generally passes into the power of her husband. But the authority which the latter possesses over his wife varies extremely among different peoples.

Frequently the wife is said to be the property or slave of her husband. In Fiji "the women are kept in great subjection. . . . Like other property, wives may be sold at pleasure, and the usual price is a musket." 1 "The Carib woman is always in bondage to her male relations. To her father, brother, or husband she is ever a slave, and seldom has any power in the disposal of herself." Many North American Indians are said to treat their wives much as they treat their dogs. Among the Shoshones "the man is the sole proprietor of his wives and daughters, and can barter them away, or dispose of them in any manner he may think proper." Among the East African Wanika a woman "is a toy, a tool, a slave in the very worst sense; indeed she is treated as though she were a

4

1 Wilkes, U.S. Exploring Expedition, iii. 332.

2 Brett, Indian Tribes of Guiana, P. 353.

3 Harmon, Journal of Voyages in the Interior of North America, p. 344. Lewis and Clarke, Travels to the Source of the Missouri River, p. 307.

1

mere brute." Many other statements to a similar effect are met with in ethnographical literature.2

3

Yet it seems that even in cases where the husband's power over his wife is described as absolute custom has not left her entirely destitute of rights. Of the Australian aborigines in general it is said that “the husband is the absolute owner of his wife (or wives)”; of the natives of Central Australia, that "each father of a family rules absolutely over his own circle"; of certain tribes in West Australia, that the state of slavery in which the women are kept is truly deplorable, and that the mere presence of their husbands makes them tremble.5 But we have reason to believe that there is some exaggeration in these statements, and they certainly do not hold good of the whole Australian race. We have

noticed above that custom does not really allow the Australian husband full liberty to kill his wife. For punishing or divorcing her he must sometimes have the consent of the tribe." There are even cases in which a wife whose husband has been unfaithful to her may complain of his conduct to the elders of the tribe, and he may have to suffer for it.s In North-West-Central Queensland the women. on one special occasion

[ocr errors]

are

1 New, Life, Wanderings, and Labourings in Eastern Africa, p. 119. 2 Gibbs, Tribes of Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon,' in Contributions to N. American Ethnology, i. 198. von Martius, Beiträge zur Ethnographie Amerika's, i. 104 (Brazilian Indians). Reade, Savage Africa, p. 548 (Negroes of Equatorial Africa). Proyart, History of Loango,' in Pinkerton, Collection of Voyages and Travels, xvi. 570 (Negroes of Loango). Andersson, Notes on Travel in South Africa, p. 236 (Ovambo). Castrén, Nordiska resor och forskningar, i. 310; ii. 56 (Ostyaks). In all these cases women are said to be mere articles of commerce, or slaves, or kept in a state of dependence bordering on slavery. In other instances women are said to be oppressed by their husbands, or treated

as inferior beings (Waitz [-Gerland], Anthropologie der Naturvölker, iii. 100 [North American Indians]; vi. 626 [Melanesians]. Bancroft, Native Races of the Pacific States, i. 121 [Hare and Sheep Indians]. Powers, Tribes of California, p. 133 [Yuki]. Tuckey, Expedition to Explore the River Zaire, p. 371 [Negroes]. Ling Roth, Aborigines of Tasmania, p. 54).

3 Curr, The Australian Race, i. 109. 4 Eyre, Expeditions of Discovery into Central Australia, ii. 317.

5 Salvado, Mémoires historiques sur l'Australie, p. 279. For other similar statements referring to the Australian aborigines, see Nieboer, Slavery as an Industrial System, p. 11.

6 Supra, p. 418.

7 Nieboer, op. cit. p. 17.
8 Ibid. p. 18.

2

allowed themselves to inflict punishments upon the men : at a certain stage of the initiation ceremony "each woman can exercise her right of punishing any man who may have ill-treated, abused, or hammered' her, and for whom she may have waited months or perhaps years to chastise." 1 Of the natives of Central Australia Messrs. Spencer and Gillen say that "the women are certainly not treated usually with anything which could be called excessive harshness ";" and and we hear from various authorities that in several Australian tribes married people are often much attached to each other, and continue to be so even when they grow old. Among the aborigines of New South Wales, for instance, "the husbands are as a general rule fond of their wives, and the wives loyal and affectionate to their husbands." Nay, white men who have lived among the blacks assure us that there are henpecked husbands even in the Australian desert."

4

Other instances may be added to show that the so-called absolute authority of husbands over their wives is not to be taken too literally. Of the Guiana Indians Mr. Im Thurn observes :-"The woman is held to be as completely the property of the man as his dog. He may even sell her if he chooses." 6 But in another place the same authority admits not only that the women in a quiet way may have a considerable influence with the men, but that, "even if the men were-though this is in fact quite contrary to their nature-inclined to treat them cruelly, public opinion would prevent this." Of the Plains Indians of the United States Colonel Dodge writes:—“The husband owns his wife entirely. He may abuse her, beat her, even kill her without question. She is more absolutely a slave than any negro before the war of rebellion.' But

1 Roth, Ethnol. Studies among the North-West-Central Queensland Aborigines, pp. 141, 176.

2 Spencer and Gillen, Native Tribes of Central Australia, p. 50.

3 Westermarck, History of Human Marriage, p. 359. Stirling, Report of the Horn Expedition to Central

Australia, Anthropology, p. 36.

4 Hill and Thornton, Aborigines of New South Wales, p. 7.

5 Calvert, Aborigines of Western Australia, p. 31.

6 Im Thurn, Indians of Guiana, p. 223.

7 Ibid. p. 215.

[ocr errors]

on the following page we are told that custom gives to every married woman of the tribes "the absolute right to leave her husband and become the wife of any other man, the sole condition being that the new husband must have the means to pay for her." Among the Chippewyans the women are said to be "as much in the power of the men as any other articles of their property," although, at the same time," they are always consulted, and possess a very considerable influence in the traffic with Europeans, and other important concerns." Among the Mongols a woman is "entirely dependent on her husband"; yet "in the household the rights of the wife are nearly equal to those of the husband." Dr. Paulitschke tells us that among the Somals, Danakil, and Gallas, a wife has no rights whatever in relation to her husband, being merely a piece of property; but subsequently we learn that she is his equal, and "a mistress of her own will." We must certainly not, like Mr. Spencer, conclude that where women are exchangeable for oxen or other beasts they are "of course" regarded as equally without personal rights. The bride-price is a compensation for the loss sustained in the giving up of the girl, and a remuneration for the expenses incurred in her maintenance till the time of her marriage; it does not eo ipso confer on the husband absolute rights over her. With reference to certain tribes in South-Eastern Africa, the Rev. James Macdonald observes :-"A man obtains a wife by giving her father a certain number of cattle. This, though often called such, is not purchase in the usual sense of the word. The woman does not become a chattel. She cannot be resold or ill-treated beyond well-defined legal limits. She retains certain rights to property and an interest in the cattle paid for her. They are a guarantee for the husband's good

[blocks in formation]

behaviour." There are even peoples among whom the husband's authority hardly exists, although he has had to pay for his wife.2

Among many peoples the hardest drudgeries of life are said to be imposed on the women. Among the Kutchin "the women are literally beasts of burden to their lords and masters. All the heavy work is performed by them." 3 The Californian Karok, while on a journey, lays by far the greatest burdens on his wife, whom he regards as a drudge. Among the Kenistenos the life of the women is an uninterrupted succession of toil and pain, hence "they are sometimes known to destroy their female children, to save them from the miseries which they themselves have suffered." 5 "The condition of the women among the Chaymas," says von Humboldt, "like that in all semi-barbarous nations, is a state of privation. and suffering. The hardest labour is their share."" Among the Australian aborigines "wives have to undergo all the drudgery of the camp and the march, have the poorest food and the hardest work." In Eastern Central Africa "the women hold an inferior position. They are viewed as beasts of burden, which do all the harder work." Among the Kakhyens "the men are averse to labour, but the lot of all women, irrespective of rank, is one of drudgery";" and so forth.10 But it seems that

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

7

10 For other instances, see Mackenzie, Voyages to the Frozen and Pacific Oceans, p. 147 (Rocky Mountain Indians); Parker, in Schoolcraft, Archives, v. 684 (Comanches); Im Thurn, op. cit. p. 215 (Guiana Indians); Keane, Botocudos,' in Jour. Anthr. Inst. xiii. 206; Weddell, Voyage towards the South Pole, p. 156, Darwin, Journal of Researches, p. 216, and Bove, Patagonia, p. 131 (Fuegians); Nieboer, op. cit. p. 13 sqq. (Australian aborigines); Williams and Calvert, Fiji, p. 145; Forster, Voyage round the World, ii. 324 (natives of Tana, of the New Hebrides); Zimmermann, Inseln des indischen und stillen Meeres, ii. 17 (New Caledonians), 105 (New Irelanders); Lewin, Wild Races of

« ¡è͹˹éÒ´Óà¹Ô¹¡ÒõèÍ
 »