Corruption and Democracy in ThailandPolitical Economy Centre, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, 1994 - 179 ˹éÒ Shows how corruption can change politics, and so contributes greatly to a better understanding of the corruption issue. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 83
˹éÒ 2
When the coup-leaders formed a government in April 1992, three of those they
had accused of becoming 'unusually rich' a year earlier were offered posts in the
cabinet. Corruption has become a key variable in the debate on who should rule,
...
When the coup-leaders formed a government in April 1992, three of those they
had accused of becoming 'unusually rich' a year earlier were offered posts in the
cabinet. Corruption has become a key variable in the debate on who should rule,
...
˹éÒ 2
When the coup-leaders formed a government in April 1992, three of those they
had accused of becoming 'unusually rich' a year earlier were offered posts in the
cabinet. Corruption has become a key variable in the debate on who should rule,
...
When the coup-leaders formed a government in April 1992, three of those they
had accused of becoming 'unusually rich' a year earlier were offered posts in the
cabinet. Corruption has become a key variable in the debate on who should rule,
...
˹éÒ 19
However Huntington suggested that some types of corruption may strengthen
political parties and in the long run lead to political development. He pointed out
that in Europe and the US in the early stages of industrialisation and democratic ...
However Huntington suggested that some types of corruption may strengthen
political parties and in the long run lead to political development. He pointed out
that in Europe and the US in the early stages of industrialisation and democratic ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅ觢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
Gift Cheques and Gin Muang | 1 |
How Much? From Sarit to Chatichai | 23 |
Local Influence and Democracy | 51 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
4 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
accept activities administration amount areas arms asked assets associates Bangkok became become behaviour budget building bureaucrats businessmen called candidates central Chatichai commission commission fees companies connections consider construction contracts corruption cost coup democratic Director economic elected expect expenditure force forms funds gift give government officials groups illegal important income increase individual influence interests involved Italy jao pho Kamnan Khun land Leng major March military million baht Minister Ministry operate opportunities organisation parliament percent period police police officers political parties politicians position practice present Prime Minister promotion provincial purchase receive reform region relatively reported respondents result role rules Sarit Second social society sums term Thai Thailand Third traditional wealth
ºÃóҹءÃÁ
| ª×èÍ˹ѧÊ×Í | Corruption and Democracy in Thailand |
| ¼Ùéà¢Õ¹ | Pasuk Phongpaichit, Sangsit Phiriyarangsan |
| ¼Ùé¨Ñ´¾ÔÁ¾ì | Political Economy Centre, Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, 1994 |
| µé¹©ºÑºÁÒ¨Ò¡ | University of Michigan |
| á»Å§à»ç¹¢éÍÁÙÅ´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ | 21 µ.¤. 2008 |
| ¤ÇÒÁÂÒÇ | 179 ˹éÒ |
| Êè§ÍÍ¡¡ÒÃÍéÒ§ÍÔ§ | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |