ÀҾ˹éÒ˹ѧÊ×Í
PDF
ePub

(2) Formal briefing sessions should be held, preferably on company premises, with representatives from these recruiting sources. Plant tours, presentations by minority and female employees, clear and concise explanations of current and future job openings, position descriptions, worker specifications, explanations of the company's selection process, and recruiting literature should be an integral part of the briefings. Formal arrangements should be made for referral of applicants, followup with sources, and feedback on disposition of applicants. (3) Minority and female employees, using procedures similar to subparagraph (2) of this paragraph, should be actively encouraged to refer applicants.

(4) A special effort should be made to include minorities and women on the Personnel Relations staff.

(5) Minority and female employees should be made available for participation in Career Days, Youth Motivation Programs, and related activities in their communities.

(6) Active participation in "Job Fairs" is desirable. Company representatives so participating should be given authority to make on-the-spot commitments. (7) Active recruiting programs should be carried out at secondary schools, junior colleges, and colleges with predominant minority or female enrollments. (8) Recruiting efforts at all schools should incorporate special efforts to reach minorities and women.

(9) Special employment programs should be undertaken whenever possible. Some possible programs are:

(i) Technical and nontechnical co-op programs with predominately Negro and women's colleges.

(ii) "After school" and/or work-study jobs for minority youths, male and females.

(iii) Summer jobs for underprivileged youth, male and female.

(iv) Summer work-study programs for male and female faculty members of the predominantly minority schools and colleges.

(v) Motivation, training and employment programs for the hard-core unemployed, male and female.

(10) When recruiting brochures pictorially present work situations, the minority and female members of the work force should be included, especially when such brochures are used in school and career programs.

(11) Help wanted advertising should be expanded to include the minority news media and women's interest media on a regular basis.

(f) The contractor should insure that minority and female employees are given equal opportunity for promotion. Suggestions for achieving this result include:

(1) Post or otherwise announce promotional opportunities.

(2) Make an inventory of current minority and female employees to determine academic, skill and experience level of individual employees.

(3) Initiate necessary remedial, job training and workstudy programs. (4) Develop and implement formal employee evaluation programs.

(5) Make certain "worker specifications" have been validated on job performance related criteria. (Neither minority nor female employees should be required to possess higher qualifications than those of the lowest qualified incumbent.)

(6) When apparently qualified minority or female employees are passed over for upgrading, require supervisory personnel to submit written justification. (7) Establish formal career counseling programs to include attitude development, education aid, job rotation, buddy system and similar programs.

(8) Review seniority practices and seniority clauses in union contracts to insure such practices or clauses are nondiscriminatory and do not have a discriminatory effect.

(g) Make certain facilities and company-sponsored social and recreation activities are resegregated. Actively encourage all employees to participate.

(h) Encourage child care, housing and transportation programs appropriately designed to improve the employment opportunities for minorities and women. § 60-2.25 Internal audit and reporting systems.

(a) The contractor should monitor records of referrals, placements, transfers, promotions and terminations at all levels to insure nondiscriminatory policy is carried out.

(b) The contractor should require formal reports from unit managers on a schedule basis as to degree to which corporate or unit goals are attained and timetables met.

(c) The contractor should review report results with all levels of management.

(d) The contractor should advise top management of program effectiveness and submit recommendations to improve unsatisfactory performance.

§ 60-2.26 Support of action programs.

(a) The contractor should appoint key members of management to serve on Merit Employment Councils, Community Relations Boards and similar organizations.

(b) The contractor should encourage minority and female employees to participate actively in National Alliance of Businessmen programs for youth motivation.

(c) The contractor should support Vocational Guidance Institutes, Vestibule Training Programs and similar activities.

(d) The contractor should assist secondary schools and colleges in programs designed to enable minority and female graduates of these institutions to compete in the open employment market on a more equitable basis.

(e) The contractor should publicize achievements of minority and female employees in local and minority news media.

(f) The contractor should support programs developed by such organizations as National Alliance of Businessmen, the Urban Coalition and other organizations concerned with employment opportunities for minorities or women.

$60-2.30 Use of goals.

SUBPART D-MISCELLANEOUS

The purpose of a contractor's establishment and use of goals is to insure that he meet his affirmative action obligation. It is not intended and should not be used to discriminate against any applicant or employee because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

§ 60-2.31 Preemption.

To the extent that any State or local laws, regulations or ordinances, including those which grant special benefits to persons on account of sex, are in conflict with Executive Order 11246, as amended, or with the requirements of this part, we will regard them as preempted under the Executive order.

§ 60-2.32 Supersedure.

All orders, instructions, regulations, and memoranda of the Secretary of Labor, other officials of the Department of Labor and contracting agencies are hereby superseded to the extent that they are inconsistent herewith, including a previous "Order No. 4" from this Office dated January 30, 1970. Nothing in this part is intended to amend 41 CFR 60-3 published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on October 2, 1971 or Employee Testing and Other Selection Procedures or 41 CFR 60-20 on Sex Discrimination Guidelines.

Effective date. This part shall become effective on the date of its publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER (12-4-71).

Signed at Washington, D.C., this 1st day of December 1971.

J. D. HODGSON,

Secretary of Labor.

HORACE E. MENASCO,

Acting Assistant Secretary

for Employment Standards. JOHN L. WILKS,

Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance.

[FR Doc. 71-17789, Filed 12-3-71; 8:51 a.m.]

Hon. DON EDWARDS,

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,
Washington, D.C., May 11, 1972.

Chairman, Civil Rights Oversight Subcommittee, Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.

DEAR MR. EDWARDS: This will reply to your letter of March 27, 1972 in which you ask for information concerning steps taken by the Corporation to prevent violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000e-2000e-15), relating to equal employment opportunity.

The Department of the Treasury is the primary enforcement agency with regard to compliance by banks with Title VII of the 1964 Act. Under Treasury regulations implementing Executive Order 11246 (41 C.F.R. §§ 10-12.801-1012.815), all banks with 50 or more employees must file Equal Opportunity Reports with the Joint Reporting Committee of the Equal Opportunity Commission and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance of the Department of Labor and with the Treasury Department. In addition, such banks must have on file on their premises a written Affirmative Action Program outlining their plans with respect to implementation of the Treasury regulations and the Executive Order.

To aid the Department of the Treasury in the performance of its functions, Corporation examiners, in the course of their regular examinations of insured State nonmember banks, determine that the last required Equal Opportunity Report has been duly filed and that the bank has a written Affirmative Action Program on file.

You also request a memorandum of law concerning sanctions available to the Corporation with respect to the correction of existing discriminatory practices or the prevention of the establishment of discriminatory practices.

The primary sanction available to the Corporation is found in section 8(b) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1818 (b)), authorizing the Corporation in the case of insured State nonmember banks, and the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System with respect to national banks and State member banks respectively, to institute cease-and-desist proceedings when it appears that such a bank has engaged in or is about to engage in any violation of law, rule or regulation. A violation of either the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or the Treasury regulations implementing that Act would be a sufficient basis for instituting proceedings by the Corporation under section 8(b).

If we can be of any further assistance, please let us know.

Sincerely,

FRANK WILLE, Chairman.

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM,
Washington, D.C., 18, 1972.

Hon. DON EDWARDS,
Chairman, Civil Rights Oversight Subcommittee, Committee on the Judiciary,
House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: I am writing in reply to your request for an outline of actions the Board of Governors has taken to prevent violations of the equal employment opportunity policies of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by institutions which the Board supervises, namely, State member banks.

As you know, under Executive Order 11246, the Equal Opportunity Program Office in the Treasury Department is the compliance agency for commercial banks. In cooperation with the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve examiners determine whether State member banks have: (1) filed required reports with the Joint Reporting Committee of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; (2) sent copies of the reports to the Treasury Department and the Department of Labor; and (3) kept on file a written affirmative action plan. Copies of the Federal Reserve examiners' findings are forwarded to the Treasury Department for any compliance work necessary.

Over and above this cooperative interagency effort, the Board has developed several programs of its own in which you may be interested.

1. In April 1971, the Board adopted regulations covering nondiscrimination in employment by Board contractors and subcontractors holding construction, service and supply contracts.

Although the Board is not within the class of Federal Executive Agencies to which Executive Order 11246 applies, the concept of the executive order relating to the equal employment policy on contracts and subcontracts is being fully applied by the Board to the contracts and subcontracts to which the Board is a party. Also, the provisions of the "Washington Plan" which cover quantified minority hiring goals in 11 skilled contruction trades are included in the prime contract for the Board building annex now under construction.

2. An Affirmative Action Plan with quantified objectives and timetables covering the recruitment, hiring, assignment, training, and promotion of minorities and women was initially adopted by the Board in December 1960. This plan is revised annually. Each Federal Reserve Bank has an Affirmative Action Plan as well, similar to that of the Board.

3. In November 1969, the Board adopted regulations and procedures applicable to Board employees to provide a method for the processing of complaints in the field of equal employment opportunity. Equal employment counselors and a Federal Women's Program Coordinator have been appointed.

4. In March 1971, the Board appointed a Director of Equal Employment Opportunity who monitors the affirmative action plans of the Board and the Reserve Banks and serves as a consultant to the Reserve Banks on all equal employment opportunity matters, including the processing of discrimination complaints. Finally, in response to your request, I am enclosing a copy of a legal memorandum concerning the extent to which the Board of Governors has authority with respect to member banks to impose sanctions designed to correct existing discriminatory patterns or to prevent establishment of discriminatory patterns. Sincerely yours, ARTHUR F. BURNS.

Enclosure

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

This memorandum discusses the extent to which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has authority with respect to State member banks to impose sanctions designed to correct existing discriminatory employment patterns or to prevent establishment of discriminatory employment practices. It was prepared in response to an inquiry from Representative Don Edwards, Chairman, Civil Rights Oversight Subcommittee, Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives.

I. BOARD POWERS IN GENERAL

In the exercise of its supervisory functions relating to State member banks, the Board possesses limited statutory authority. The Board is not a bank chartering authority and the rights and privileges of State member banks are derived directly from the chartering authorities of the respective States. While State member banks are subject to various provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and other federal banking laws, primary supervisory and regulatory control rests with the State chartering authorities.

The Federal Reserve Act, 12 U.S.C. § 330, provides :

66

. . [A]ny bank becoming a member of the Federal Reserve System shall retain its full charter and statutory rights as a State bank or trust company and may continue to exercise all corporate powers granted it by the State in which it was created . . ."

The Board, early in its history, recognized its narrow regulatory and supervisory role when it stated:

[T]he Board understands that it is not its function to undertake to impose on the activities of member banks, any restrictions that are not contemplated by the Act, but only to prescribe such regulations as are designed to carry out the purposes of the Act." (1916 Federal Reserve Bulletin 393)

In its relations with State member banks, the Board continues to rely on statutory authorization as a basis for exercising its supervisory responsibilities.

Sections 9 and 11(a) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 325, 248 (a)) authorize the Board to examine the accounts, books, and affairs of member banks and to require such statements and reports as the Board deems necessary to carry out the purposes of the Act. Traditionally, the exercise of this authority has been restricted to matters affecting the financial soundness of the State member banks. Federal banking law contains no provision which would serve as a basis for the assumption by the Board of overall supervisory power over the employment policies of State member banks except as these policies may prove detrimental to the financial soundless of a bank.

II. TITLE VII AND EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246-ENFORCEMENT SCHEME

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Equal Opportunity Act of 1972 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-2000e-15), prohibits racial discrimination or other unlawful employment practices by any employer engaged in any industry affecting commerce who has fifteen or more employees (§ 703 (a)). It seems clear that banks, including State member banks of the Federal Reserve System, are covered by the provisions of Title VII.

The enforcement scheme established by Title VII, as amended, includes investigation by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), attempts by that agency to eliminate an allegedly discriminatory practice through informal conference and conciliation, and initiation by the EEOC of a civil action against any respondent not a government, government agency or political subdivision

(§ 706(a)–(d)). Where a charge of unlawful employment practices is dismissed by the EEOC after its investigation, the Act provides that a civil action may be brought by the person claiming to be aggrieved against the respondent named in the charge (§ 706 (f) (1)). Where the EEOC, on the basis of a preliminary investigation, concludes that prompt judicial action is necessary, it may bring an action for appropriate temporary relief pending final disposition of the charge. The court in which such action is brought may enjoin the respondent from engaging in such unlawful employment practice and order such affirmative action as it finds appropriate (§ 706 (f) (2), (f) (5)). Where the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the requirements of Title VII and such action is intended to deny the full exercise of the rights under Title VII, the Attorney General may bring a civil action requesting relief. This action may include application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order against such persons responsible for the pattern or practice (§ 707(a)). The 1972 Act provides that the EEOC will assume the functions now performed by the Attorney General with respect to initiation of employment discrimination actions, two years from the effective date of the Act. The Act does not appear to grant authority to the Board or any other financial supervisory agency to institute proceedings to enforce Title VII.

In addition to the enforcement provisions of Title VII, Executive Order 11246, as amended. (30 F.R. 12319) affects all Federal depositories and issuers of U.S. Savings Bonds and Notes, including commercial banks, savings banks, and savings and loan associations serving as issuing and paying agents of the United States. Under this Executive Order, the Department of the Treasury has primary enforcement responsibility for monitoring the employment practices of banks and other financial institutions. Treasury regulations, issued pursuant to this authority (41 CFR §§ 10-12.801-10-12.815), provide that banks with 50 or more employees are required to develop and maintain a written affirmative action program and must file Equal Opportunity Reports (Standard Form EEO-1) with the Joint Reporting Committee of the EEOC, the Department of Labor and the Treasury Department. Financial institutions cannot qualify as a Federal depository unless they comply with all of the provisions of Executive Order 11246. The Secretary of the Treasury may terminate at any time the qualification of a bank as a Federal depository upon a finding of noncompliance with the provisions of the Executive Order (31 CFR 214.5 (e)).

Federal Reserve System examiners cooperate with the Treasury by conducting a two-nart inquiry to determine whether a qualifying member bank has filed the required report and maintains a written Affirmative Action Plan. Reports containing negative findings are also forwarded to the Board's Director of Equal Employment Opportunity.

In the past, allegations against a member bank of discriminatory employment practices received by the Board have been investigated by the Department of the Treasury pursuant to its regulatory provisions, with the cooperation of the Board.

III. SANCTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE BOARD

Neither Title VII nor Executive Order 11246, as amended, provides authority whereby the Board could impose sanctions on member banks for unlawful employment practices. However, where the Board determines that a member bank has engaged in or is about to engage in any violation of law, rule or regulation, the provisions of the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act (12 U.S.C. 1818 (b) (1)) authorize the Board to initiate cease and desist proceedings against such bank. It would appear that this provision provides a basis for the institution by the Board of proceedings to enforce the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Regulations of the Department of the Treasury.

Hon. DON EDWARDS,

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Washington, D.C.

Chairman, Subcommittee on Civil Rights Oversight, Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C.

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: In response to your May 8, 1972 letter asking four questions relevant to your study of the Federal Power Commission, the following answers are provided:

Question 1. What are the parameters of the General Services Administration's responsibilities under Executive Order 11246 with respect to the utilities indus

« ¡è͹˹éÒ´Óà¹Ô¹¡ÒõèÍ
 »