...JeanBaudrillard,as a condition of hyperreality where aestheticisation has turned on itself, where even art 'is dead, not only because its critical transcendence...itself, entirely impregnated by an aesthetic which is inseparable from its own structure, has been confused with its own image'.6 More specifically though:...

...(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988). 18. "And so art is everywhere, since artifice is at the heart of reality. And so art is dead, not only because...itself, entirely impregnated by an aesthetic which is unseparable from its own structure, has been confused with its own image" (Jean Baudrillard, "The Orders...

...everything' in a space in which art is said to be 'everywhere' and 'dead'. This is so. Baudrillard had added, not only 'because its critical transcendence is gone',...itself, entirely impregnated by an aesthetic which is inseparable from its own structure, has been confused with its own image'.133 Baudrillard's use of...

...fashion and the models, of the blind and brilliant ambiance of the simulacra.'"5 Baudrillard continues: 'And so art is everywhere, since artifice is at the...dead, not only because its critical transcendence is gone,57 but because reality itself, entirely impregnated by an aesthetic which is inseparable from...

...a reproducing machine (Warhol), without ceasing to be art, since the machine is only a sign. . . . And so art is everywhere, since artifice is at the...reality. And so art is dead, not only because its ctitical transcendence is gone, but because reality itself, entirely impregnated by an aesthetic which...

...everyday and banal reality, falls by this token under the sign of art, and becomes aesthetic". . . . And so art is everywhere, since artifice is at the very heart of reality. (Baudrillard 1983:151 Featherstone 1991:271) Others following this reductionist perspective see consumer...

...ceasingtobe art, since the machine isonlyasign. (...) And so art is everywhere, since artifice is at the heart of reality. And so art is dead, not only because...itself, entirely impregnated by an aesthetic which is inseperable from its own structure, has been confused with its own image." Ook film en televisiebeelden...

...reproduction is the aura of the work of art. —Walter Benjamin, "Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" And so art is dead, not only because its critical...itself, entirely impregnated by an aesthetic which is inseparable from its own structure, has been confused with its own image. —Jean Baudrillard, "Simulations"...

...desires finally everywhere infuses a reality that is inseparable from its aesthetic representation. "And so art is dead, not only because its critical...transcendence is gone, but because reality itself. . . has been confused with its own image" (Baudrillard 1983b, 151). Mass tourism, films made in spectacular...

...logic. 5 Salmu: Representation in the Real The outside is the inside. — Jacques Derrida (1974:44) And so art is everywhere, since artifice is at the very heart of reality. — Jean Baudrillard (1983:151) IN OF GRAMMATOLOGT, Derrida equated the separation between soul and...