Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 13
˹éÒ 78
1 A choice matrix from the minimal intergroup experiments Allocation to : Ingroup
member 21 IIIC Outgroup Is 1 6 member 7 8 9 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 Source : Tajfel ( 1970 : 97 ) booklet containing 18 pages of allocation ...
1 A choice matrix from the minimal intergroup experiments Allocation to : Ingroup
member 21 IIIC Outgroup Is 1 6 member 7 8 9 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 Source : Tajfel ( 1970 : 97 ) booklet containing 18 pages of allocation ...
˹éÒ 81
1 Studies of equity in intergroup allocation Differential allocation to more
productive worker More productive worker = ingroup ... 00 tribution at the time
allocations are made ( Ancok and Chertkoff 1983 ; Ng 1984 ; Lerner and Grant
1990 ) .
1 Studies of equity in intergroup allocation Differential allocation to more
productive worker More productive worker = ingroup ... 00 tribution at the time
allocations are made ( Ancok and Chertkoff 1983 ; Ng 1984 ; Lerner and Grant
1990 ) .
˹éÒ 93
Based on this definition , the allocation task used in the minimal intergroup
experiments can be seen in terms of assignment of power to determine the
outcomes ( fate ) of group members ( Ng 1982a ) . When members of both groups
are given ...
Based on this definition , the allocation task used in the minimal intergroup
experiments can be seen in terms of assignment of power to determine the
outcomes ( fate ) of group members ( Ng 1982a ) . When members of both groups
are given ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
4 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University University Library values