Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 13
˹éÒ 78
Figure 4.1 A choice matrix from the minimal intergroup experiments Allocation to :
Ingroup member 18 17 16 15 14 13 1312 II 10 287 6 5 Outgroup member 5 6 7 8
9 IO II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Source : Tajfel ( 1970 : 97 ) booklet containing 18 ...
Figure 4.1 A choice matrix from the minimal intergroup experiments Allocation to :
Ingroup member 18 17 16 15 14 13 1312 II 10 287 6 5 Outgroup member 5 6 7 8
9 IO II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Source : Tajfel ( 1970 : 97 ) booklet containing 18 ...
˹éÒ 81
Table 4.1 Studies of equity in intergroup allocation Differential allocation to more
productive worker More productive ... and Grant ( 1990 ) +1.53 +3.63 -0.53 +3.40
+2.00 tribution at the time allocations are made ( Ancok and Chertkoff 1983 ; Ng ...
Table 4.1 Studies of equity in intergroup allocation Differential allocation to more
productive worker More productive ... and Grant ( 1990 ) +1.53 +3.63 -0.53 +3.40
+2.00 tribution at the time allocations are made ( Ancok and Chertkoff 1983 ; Ng ...
˹éÒ 93
Based on this definition , the allocation task used in the minimal intergroup
experiments can be seen in terms of assignment of power to determine the
outcomes ( fate ) of group members ( Ng 1982a ) . When members of both groups
are given ...
Based on this definition , the allocation task used in the minimal intergroup
experiments can be seen in terms of assignment of power to determine the
outcomes ( fate ) of group members ( Ng 1982a ) . When members of both groups
are given ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅ觢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
3 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University Library
ºÃóҹءÃÁ
| ª×èÍ˹ѧÊ×Í | Intergroup Relations Mapping social psychology |
| ¼Ùéà¢Õ¹ | Marilynn B. Brewer, Norman Miller |
| ©ºÑº | ©ºÑº·ÕèÁÕÀÒ¾»ÃСͺ |
| ¼Ùé¨Ñ´¾ÔÁ¾ì | Open University Press, 1996 |
| µé¹©ºÑºÁÒ¨Ò¡ | University of California |
| á»Å§à»ç¹¢éÍÁÙÅ´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ | 17 µ.¤. 2008 |
| ISBN | 0335092616, 9780335092611 |
| ¤ÇÒÁÂÒÇ | 191 ˹éÒ |
| Êè§ÍÍ¡¡ÒÃÍéÒ§ÍÔ§ | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |