Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 26
˹éÒ 43
It is not always clear from the experimental procedures that Rabbie uses to
induce “ common fate ” whether shared outcomes necessarily involve true
interdependence . Interdependence means that one person's outcomes are
affected directly ...
It is not always clear from the experimental procedures that Rabbie uses to
induce “ common fate ” whether shared outcomes necessarily involve true
interdependence . Interdependence means that one person's outcomes are
affected directly ...
˹éÒ 123
Recategorization : the common ingroup identity model The second model of
intergroup contact ( Figure 5.2b ) is also based on the premiss that ingroup bias
is most difficult to overcome when ingroup - outgroup distinctions are highly
salient .
Recategorization : the common ingroup identity model The second model of
intergroup contact ( Figure 5.2b ) is also based on the premiss that ingroup bias
is most difficult to overcome when ingroup - outgroup distinctions are highly
salient .
˹éÒ 124
Consistently , conditions that enhance the salience of the common team identity
and reduce the salience of subcategory identities are found to diminish or
eliminate ingroup bias in evaluation of fellow team members . To the extent that ...
Consistently , conditions that enhance the salience of the common team identity
and reduce the salience of subcategory identities are found to diminish or
eliminate ingroup bias in evaluation of fellow team members . To the extent that ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅ觢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
3 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University Library
ºÃóҹءÃÁ
| ª×èÍ˹ѧÊ×Í | Intergroup Relations Mapping social psychology |
| ¼Ùéà¢Õ¹ | Marilynn B. Brewer, Norman Miller |
| ©ºÑº | ©ºÑº·ÕèÁÕÀÒ¾»ÃСͺ |
| ¼Ùé¨Ñ´¾ÔÁ¾ì | Open University Press, 1996 |
| µé¹©ºÑºÁÒ¨Ò¡ | University of California |
| á»Å§à»ç¹¢éÍÁÙÅ´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ | 17 µ.¤. 2008 |
| ISBN | 0335092616, 9780335092611 |
| ¤ÇÒÁÂÒÇ | 191 ˹éÒ |
| Êè§ÍÍ¡¡ÒÃÍéÒ§ÍÔ§ | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |