Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 6
˹éÒ 8
The first is comparative fit – the extent to which differences within categories are
less than differences between categories among the persons in a particular
context . The second is normative fit - the extent to which the specific persons
match ...
The first is comparative fit – the extent to which differences within categories are
less than differences between categories among the persons in a particular
context . The second is normative fit - the extent to which the specific persons
match ...
˹éÒ 14
Such evaluations are often comparative by nature . Some comparisons are
based on changes in the self over time . Children , for instance , often take pride
in their growth , marking their height on the back of a door and noting with glee
the ...
Such evaluations are often comparative by nature . Some comparisons are
based on changes in the self over time . Children , for instance , often take pride
in their growth , marking their height on the back of a door and noting with glee
the ...
˹éÒ 16
Yet the perception that their own caste was losing position relative to the lower
castes created a sense of comparative disadvantage that was sufficient to
motivate dramatic protest against the reforms . Just as experiences of relative
deprivation ...
Yet the perception that their own caste was losing position relative to the lower
castes created a sense of comparative disadvantage that was sufficient to
motivate dramatic protest against the reforms . Just as experiences of relative
deprivation ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅ觢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
3 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University Library
ºÃóҹءÃÁ
| ª×èÍ˹ѧÊ×Í | Intergroup Relations Mapping social psychology |
| ¼Ùéà¢Õ¹ | Marilynn B. Brewer, Norman Miller |
| ©ºÑº | ©ºÑº·ÕèÁÕÀÒ¾»ÃСͺ |
| ¼Ùé¨Ñ´¾ÔÁ¾ì | Open University Press, 1996 |
| µé¹©ºÑºÁÒ¨Ò¡ | University of California |
| á»Å§à»ç¹¢éÍÁÙÅ´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ | 17 µ.¤. 2008 |
| ISBN | 0335092616, 9780335092611 |
| ¤ÇÒÁÂÒÇ | 191 ˹éÒ |
| Êè§ÍÍ¡¡ÒÃÍéÒ§ÍÔ§ | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |