Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 40
˹éÒ 8
Some category memberships may be highly meaningful in one social situation ( e
. g . the difference between psychologists and ... The first is comparative fit – the
extent to which differences within categories are less than differences between ...
Some category memberships may be highly meaningful in one social situation ( e
. g . the difference between psychologists and ... The first is comparative fit – the
extent to which differences within categories are less than differences between ...
˹éÒ 92
However , this status effect is qualified by important factors related to the nature of
the status differences between groups and the way in which discrimination is
measured . Discrimination on the part of high status groups is related to the ...
However , this status effect is qualified by important factors related to the nature of
the status differences between groups and the way in which discrimination is
measured . Discrimination on the part of high status groups is related to the ...
˹éÒ 117
In many racially and ethnically mixed settings this is not so , easily achieved ,
since participants come into the situtation with = pre - existing status differences
based on group membership . Even - if there are no formal status differentials
within ...
In many racially and ethnically mixed settings this is not so , easily achieved ,
since participants come into the situtation with = pre - existing status differences
based on group membership . Even - if there are no formal status differentials
within ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
4 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University University Library values