Intergroup RelationsOpen University Press, 1996 - 191 ˹éÒ Intergroup Relations examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining the whole range of interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behaviour of large social groups. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 22
˹éÒ 92
... dimension of discrimination to the nature of the status differences ( van Knippenberg and van Oers 1984 ; Mummendey and Simon 1989 ) . In general , individuals tend to exaggerate differences between groups on those dimensions of ...
... dimension of discrimination to the nature of the status differences ( van Knippenberg and van Oers 1984 ; Mummendey and Simon 1989 ) . In general , individuals tend to exaggerate differences between groups on those dimensions of ...
˹éÒ 96
... dimensions . To the extent that members of low status ingroups minimize the degree of outgroup superiority , this minimal outgroup discrimination can be a form of ingroup bias ( Brewer and Campbell 1976 ) . Further , when consensual ...
... dimensions . To the extent that members of low status ingroups minimize the degree of outgroup superiority , this minimal outgroup discrimination can be a form of ingroup bias ( Brewer and Campbell 1976 ) . Further , when consensual ...
˹éÒ 98
... dimensions , ingroup bias is less likely to be exhibited on unimportant dimensions . Outgroup favoritism ( magnanimity ) is most likely to be displayed on dimensions of comparison that are important to the outgroup , but unimportant to ...
... dimensions , ingroup bias is less likely to be exhibited on unimportant dimensions . Outgroup favoritism ( magnanimity ) is most likely to be displayed on dimensions of comparison that are important to the outgroup , but unimportant to ...
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
3 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
action aggression allocation attribution bias attributions biases Brewer CALIFORNIA/SANTA CRUZ category membership Chapter cognitive competition context cooperative Crocker CRUZ The University decision desegregation dilemma dimensions discussed effects emotional ethnic ethnocentric evaluation experimental experiments factors group identity group members group membership group polarization groupthink Hewstone high status groups Hogg hostility identification individuals ingroup and outgroup ingroup bias ingroup favoritism ingroup-outgroup Insko interaction intergroup conflict intergroup contact intergroup discrimination intergroup relations interpersonal Journal of Personality Journal of Social Latino low status groups negative one's outcomes outgroup homogeneity outgroup members participants perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective positive distinctiveness prejudice prisoner's dilemma processes responses role salient self-esteem social categories social comparison social comparison theory social groups social identity theory social motives Social Psychology sociobiological status differences status differentials stereotypes study of intergroup subgroups superordinate Tajfel target tion Turner University Library UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA/SANTA