Intergroup RelationsOpen University Press, 1996 - 191 ˹éÒ Intergroup Relations examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining the whole range of interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behaviour of large social groups. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 6
˹éÒ 81
... feedback provided about individual contributions to the group task , one of these members was more productive than the other . When the category identity of the two members is not known , participants typically make an allocation in ...
... feedback provided about individual contributions to the group task , one of these members was more productive than the other . When the category identity of the two members is not known , participants typically make an allocation in ...
˹éÒ 90
... feedback . In a different experimental context , Meindl and Lerner ( 1984 ) manipulated participants ' self - esteem temporarily by rigging an acci- dent . At the beginning of the experimental session , the researcher asked the ...
... feedback . In a different experimental context , Meindl and Lerner ( 1984 ) manipulated participants ' self - esteem temporarily by rigging an acci- dent . At the beginning of the experimental session , the researcher asked the ...
˹éÒ 97
... feedback they had just received . Those who had received neutral feedback about their responses to interracial scenes were somewhat more likely to help and to give more money to a white than a black panhandler . But when students had ...
... feedback they had just received . Those who had received neutral feedback about their responses to interracial scenes were somewhat more likely to help and to give more money to a white than a black panhandler . But when students had ...
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
3 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
action aggression allocation attribution bias attributions biases Brewer CALIFORNIA/SANTA CRUZ category membership Chapter cognitive competition context cooperative Crocker CRUZ The University decision desegregation dilemma dimensions discussed effects emotional ethnic ethnocentric evaluation experimental experiments factors group identity group members group membership group polarization groupthink Hewstone high status groups Hogg hostility identification individuals ingroup and outgroup ingroup bias ingroup favoritism ingroup-outgroup Insko interaction intergroup conflict intergroup contact intergroup discrimination intergroup relations interpersonal Journal of Personality Journal of Social Latino low status groups negative one's outcomes outgroup homogeneity outgroup members participants perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective positive distinctiveness prejudice prisoner's dilemma processes responses role salient self-esteem social categories social comparison social comparison theory social groups social identity theory social motives Social Psychology sociobiological status differences status differentials stereotypes study of intergroup subgroups superordinate Tajfel target tion Turner University Library UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA/SANTA