Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 43
˹éÒ 72
Aversive racism In the studies described in the preceding section ( Baron 1979 ;
Rogers and Prentice - Dunn 1981 ) , in the no - insult conditions , white
Americans displayed less direct and indirect aggression toward black outgroup
targets ...
Aversive racism In the studies described in the preceding section ( Baron 1979 ;
Rogers and Prentice - Dunn 1981 ) , in the no - insult conditions , white
Americans displayed less direct and indirect aggression toward black outgroup
targets ...
˹éÒ 81
When the category identity of the two members is not known , participants
typically make an allocation in line with equity principles – the more productive
member is allocated more points than the less productive member . When the two
group ...
When the category identity of the two members is not known , participants
typically make an allocation in line with equity principles – the more productive
member is allocated more points than the less productive member . When the two
group ...
˹éÒ 101
... depends on individuals making comparisons at the intergroup rather than
interpersonal levels . When personal identities , rather than social identities , are
made salient , individuals are less likely to perceive relative disadvantage or ...
... depends on individuals making comparisons at the intergroup rather than
interpersonal levels . When personal identities , rather than social identities , are
made salient , individuals are less likely to perceive relative disadvantage or ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
3 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University Library