Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 9
˹éÒ 3
In cross - racial interactions majority members are more uncomfortable and
awkward ( Henley 1977 ; Ickes 1984 ) . They exhibit more avoidant nonverbal
behaviors , such as less eye contact , and other symptoms of anxiety such as
speech ...
In cross - racial interactions majority members are more uncomfortable and
awkward ( Henley 1977 ; Ickes 1984 ) . They exhibit more avoidant nonverbal
behaviors , such as less eye contact , and other symptoms of anxiety such as
speech ...
˹éÒ 46
Optimal distinctiveness theory accounts for the pervasive finding that social
identification and ingroup favoritism is greater for members of minority groups
than among majority group members ( Mullen et al . 1992a ) . This group size
effect has ...
Optimal distinctiveness theory accounts for the pervasive finding that social
identification and ingroup favoritism is greater for members of minority groups
than among majority group members ( Mullen et al . 1992a ) . This group size
effect has ...
˹éÒ 82
Some subjects were given instructions to identify with , or take the position of ,
members of the majority group in the simulation , while others were told to identify
with the minority . Those representing the majority were more likely to adopt a ...
Some subjects were given instructions to identify with , or take the position of ,
members of the majority group in the simulation , while others were told to identify
with the minority . Those representing the majority were more likely to adopt a ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
3 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University Library