Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 4
˹éÒ 77
The second phase of the experiment consisted of a different decision task
involving assignment of monetary rewards or penalties to other participants in the
session . Every participant was given a Figure 4 . 1 A choice matrix from the
minimal ...
The second phase of the experiment consisted of a different decision task
involving assignment of monetary rewards or penalties to other participants in the
session . Every participant was given a Figure 4 . 1 A choice matrix from the
minimal ...
˹éÒ 78
1 A choice matrix from the minimal intergroup experiments Allocation to : Ingroup
member 21 IIIC Outgroup Is 1 6 ... 7 8 9 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18
Source : Tajfel ( 1970 : 97 ) booklet containing 18 pages of allocation matrices .
1 A choice matrix from the minimal intergroup experiments Allocation to : Ingroup
member 21 IIIC Outgroup Is 1 6 ... 7 8 9 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18
Source : Tajfel ( 1970 : 97 ) booklet containing 18 pages of allocation matrices .
˹éÒ 79
In the matrix depicted in Figure 4 . 1 , for instance , participants allocated an ...
about the individuals personally . Since 1970 , this finding has been replicated in
many experiments using different types of allocation matrices and different ...
In the matrix depicted in Figure 4 . 1 , for instance , participants allocated an ...
about the individuals personally . Since 1970 , this finding has been replicated in
many experiments using different types of allocation matrices and different ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
4 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University University Library values