Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 28
˹éÒ 30
... interindividual attitude , associated with array of group behaviours Contextual
cues to salient individuality or interpersonal relationships Favourable appraisal of
each other , and / or the relationship Personalized personal - relationshipbased ...
... interindividual attitude , associated with array of group behaviours Contextual
cues to salient individuality or interpersonal relationships Favourable appraisal of
each other , and / or the relationship Personalized personal - relationshipbased ...
˹éÒ 83
One implication of the minimal intergroup findings was that intergroup conflict
and competition could not be accounted for solely in terms of the structural
relationships between groups , as purported by realistic group conflict theory (
Sherif ...
One implication of the minimal intergroup findings was that intergroup conflict
and competition could not be accounted for solely in terms of the structural
relationships between groups , as purported by realistic group conflict theory (
Sherif ...
˹éÒ 89
The fact that self - esteem can be investigated both as cause and effect of
discrimination leaves the overall relationship between selfesteem and ingroup
bias somewhat ambiguous ( Abrams and Hogg 1988 ; van Knippenberg and
Ellemers ...
The fact that self - esteem can be investigated both as cause and effect of
discrimination leaves the overall relationship between selfesteem and ingroup
bias somewhat ambiguous ( Abrams and Hogg 1988 ; van Knippenberg and
Ellemers ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅè§¢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
WHAT IS JUST | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
4 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's orientation outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University University Library values