Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 24
˹éÒ 93
1993 ) , possibly as compensation for unfavorable ingroup comparisons on status
- relevant dimensions . When members of lower status groups are committed to
their group identity , they express ingroup bias in those domains where the ...
1993 ) , possibly as compensation for unfavorable ingroup comparisons on status
- relevant dimensions . When members of lower status groups are committed to
their group identity , they express ingroup bias in those domains where the ...
˹éÒ 96
Further , when consensual support for status differences between groups is
removed ( when they are perceived to be unstable and illegitimate ) , outgroup
bias on the part of low status groups disappears , even on status - relevant
measures ...
Further , when consensual support for status differences between groups is
removed ( when they are perceived to be unstable and illegitimate ) , outgroup
bias on the part of low status groups disappears , even on status - relevant
measures ...
˹éÒ 101
2 Social creativity – group members may achieve positive distinctiveness by
redefining the bases of intergroup comparison , choosing new dimensions on
which the ingroup can be assigned higher values than relevant outgroups , or
changing ...
2 Social creativity – group members may achieve positive distinctiveness by
redefining the bases of intergroup comparison , choosing new dimensions on
which the ingroup can be assigned higher values than relevant outgroups , or
changing ...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅ觢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
TO US IS UNFAIR TO THEM 7 | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
4 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University University Library values
ºÃóҹءÃÁ
| ª×èÍ˹ѧÊ×Í | Intergroup Relations Mapping social psychology |
| ¼Ùéà¢Õ¹ | Marilynn B. Brewer, Norman Miller |
| ©ºÑº | ©ºÑº·ÕèÁÕÀÒ¾»ÃСͺ |
| ¼Ùé¨Ñ´¾ÔÁ¾ì | Open University Press, 1996 |
| µé¹©ºÑºÁÒ¨Ò¡ | University of California |
| á»Å§à»ç¹¢éÍÁÙÅ´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ | 17 µ.¤. 2008 |
| ¤ÇÒÁÂÒÇ | 191 ˹éÒ |
| Êè§ÍÍ¡¡ÒÃÍéÒ§ÍÔ§ | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |