Intergroup RelationsThis book examines social psychology's unique contribution to our understanding of intergroup relations, examining interactions from the level of individual psychological processes to the behavior of large social groups. It focuses on the cognitive and motivational processes that gives rise to group identity, intergroup discrimination and conflict. Intergroup Relations uses historical and contemporary examples to illustrate abstract concepts, including different types of social groupings - ethnic, religious, political and linguistic. Coverage in each chapter includes historical perspectives, current theory, methodological paradigms, emerging issues and policy applications. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 3 ¨Ò¡ 27
˹éÒ 7
This category accentuation is a consequence of processes of assimilation and
contrast whereby we judge items within the same category as more similar (
assimilation ) and items from different categories as more dissimilar ( contrast )
than ...
This category accentuation is a consequence of processes of assimilation and
contrast whereby we judge items within the same category as more similar (
assimilation ) and items from different categories as more dissimilar ( contrast )
than ...
˹éÒ 15
Ordinarily , people are inclined to see themselves as similar to others in their
attitudes , but for abilities , uniqueness may be more positive ( Marks 1984 ) . A
distinctively good ability sets one apart from the pack , and bolsters self - esteem .
Ordinarily , people are inclined to see themselves as similar to others in their
attitudes , but for abilities , uniqueness may be more positive ( Marks 1984 ) . A
distinctively good ability sets one apart from the pack , and bolsters self - esteem .
˹éÒ 39
... of communication and consensus formation in small groups ( Festinger 1950 ) .
His purpose in this earlier paper was to explain why members of groups tend to
be so similar in attitudes , values , and behavior . A basic premise of Festinger ' s
...
... of communication and consensus formation in small groups ( Festinger 1950 ) .
His purpose in this earlier paper was to explain why members of groups tend to
be so similar in attitudes , values , and behavior . A basic premise of Festinger ' s
...
¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àË繨ҡ¼ÙéÍ×è¹ - à¢Õ¹º·ÇÔ¨Òóì
àÃÒäÁ辺º·ÇÔ¨Òóìã´æ ã¹áËÅ觢éÍÁÙÅ·ÑèÇä»
à¹×éÍËÒ
FROM BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1 |
TO US IS UNFAIR TO THEM 7 | 77 |
INTERGROUP CONTACT COOPERATION | 107 |
ÅÔ¢ÊÔ·¸Ôì | |
4 à¹×éÍËÒÍ×è¹æ äÁèä´éáÊ´§äÇé
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
achieve action aggression allocation American associated attitudes attributions behavior beliefs biases Brewer causes Chapter cognitive collective common comparison competition consequence context cooperative CRUZ decision demonstrated deprivation differentiation dimensions direct disadvantaged discrimination discussed distinctiveness effects emotional et al ethnic evaluation expected experimental experiments explanation expressed factors favor feel Figure goals group members hostility identification important individuals influence ingroup ingroup bias instance interaction interest intergroup relations interpersonal involve less membership motives negative one's outcomes outgroup members participants particularly perceived perceptions Personality and Social perspective points political positive preference prejudice processes produced provides reduce relationships relative represented responses role salient self-esteem settings shared similar situation social categories social groups social identity Social Psychology status groups stereotypes studies subjects suggests Tajfel task theory tion Turner University University Library values
ºÃóҹءÃÁ
| ª×èÍ˹ѧÊ×Í | Intergroup Relations Mapping social psychology |
| ¼Ùéà¢Õ¹ | Marilynn B. Brewer, Norman Miller |
| ©ºÑº | ©ºÑº·ÕèÁÕÀÒ¾»ÃСͺ |
| ¼Ùé¨Ñ´¾ÔÁ¾ì | Open University Press, 1996 |
| µé¹©ºÑºÁÒ¨Ò¡ | University of California |
| á»Å§à»ç¹¢éÍÁÙÅ´Ô¨Ô·ÑÅ | 17 µ.¤. 2008 |
| ¤ÇÒÁÂÒÇ | 191 ˹éÒ |
| Êè§ÍÍ¡¡ÒÃÍéÒ§ÍÔ§ | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |