Summaries of Leading Cases on the ConstitutionRowman & Littlefield Publishers, 26 µ.¤. 2004 - 640 ˹éÒ First published in 1954, Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution quickly became the gold standard for concise summaries of important U.S. Supreme Court cases on constitutional law. Covering decisions from the establishment of the Court to the present, the book incorporates every facet of constitutional law, including the powers and privileges of the three branches of the national government, federalism, war powers, and extensive briefs on civil rights and liberties. The fourteenth edition has been thoroughly reorganized to make it easier to use and to correspond more closely to the outline of the U.S. Constitution. In addition, it includes information on important concurring and dissenting opinions, the complete text of the Constitution, a readily useable index and dictionary, and information about Supreme Court justices. Updated through the end of the 2003 term, the fiftieth anniversary edition of Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution is an essential resource for law students, lawyers, and everyone interested in our nation''s Constitution. |
¨Ò¡´éÒ¹ã¹Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í
¼Å¡Òäé¹ËÒ 1 - 5 ¨Ò¡ 38
˹éÒ 6
... Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are the most loquacious members of the current court , with Justice Clarence Thomas speaking from the bench so rarely that occasions , as in recent cases involving cross - burning and affirmative action ...
... Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are the most loquacious members of the current court , with Justice Clarence Thomas speaking from the bench so rarely that occasions , as in recent cases involving cross - burning and affirmative action ...
˹éÒ 41
... Scalia's dissent argued that the " guidelines " developed by the com- mission " have the force and effect of laws . " Moreover , this " lawmaking function " is " completely divorced from any responsibility for execution of the law or ...
... Scalia's dissent argued that the " guidelines " developed by the com- mission " have the force and effect of laws . " Moreover , this " lawmaking function " is " completely divorced from any responsibility for execution of the law or ...
˹éÒ 104
... Scalia authored a classic dissent arguing that this law violated sep- aration of powers by effectively forcing a president to launch an inves- tigation that he did not think was warranted by individuals that Scalia did not think were ...
... Scalia authored a classic dissent arguing that this law violated sep- aration of powers by effectively forcing a president to launch an inves- tigation that he did not think was warranted by individuals that Scalia did not think were ...
˹éÒ 106
¤Ø³¶Ö§¢Õ´¨Ó¡Ñ´¡ÒôÙ˹ѧÊ×ÍàÅèÁ¹ÕéáÅéÇ.
¤Ø³¶Ö§¢Õ´¨Ó¡Ñ´¡ÒôÙ˹ѧÊ×ÍàÅèÁ¹ÕéáÅéÇ.
˹éÒ 168
¤Ø³¶Ö§¢Õ´¨Ó¡Ñ´¡ÒôÙ˹ѧÊ×ÍàÅèÁ¹ÕéáÅéÇ.
¤Ø³¶Ö§¢Õ´¨Ó¡Ñ´¡ÒôÙ˹ѧÊ×ÍàÅèÁ¹ÕéáÅéÇ.
©ºÑºÍ×è¹æ - ´Ù·Ñé§ËÁ´
Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution Joseph Francis Menez,John R. Vile ªÁºÒ§Êèǹ¢Í§Ë¹Ñ§Ê×Í - 2004 |
¤ÓáÅÐÇÅÕ·Õ辺ºèÍÂ
action African American applied argued in dissent Article authority basis Bill of Rights Black Board Brennan California Chief Justice Circuit Court citizens civil claim commerce clause concurring Congress congressional constitutionality contract convicted Court held Court of Appeals criminal decision Decision-Yes denied discrimination due process clause election Eleventh Amendment enforce equal protection clause establishment clause executive exercise fact Facts-In Facts-The Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment freedom governmental granted guaranteed immunity individual interest interstate commerce involving issue judge judicial jurisdiction jury legislation legislature liberty limited ment national government O'Connor opinion person police political president prohibited punishment question Question-Does racial ratified Reasons-C.J. Reasons-J regulate Rehnquist religion religious rule Scalia School District Section Senate speech statute Stevens suit Tenth Amendment tion trial U.S. Constitution U.S. District Court U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United upheld violation Virginia vote York