Summaries of Leading Cases on the ConstitutionRowman & Littlefield Publishers, 26 ต.ค. 2004 - 640 หน้า First published in 1954, Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution quickly became the gold standard for concise summaries of important U.S. Supreme Court cases on constitutional law. Covering decisions from the establishment of the Court to the present, the book incorporates every facet of constitutional law, including the powers and privileges of the three branches of the national government, federalism, war powers, and extensive briefs on civil rights and liberties. The fourteenth edition has been thoroughly reorganized to make it easier to use and to correspond more closely to the outline of the U.S. Constitution. In addition, it includes information on important concurring and dissenting opinions, the complete text of the Constitution, a readily useable index and dictionary, and information about Supreme Court justices. Updated through the end of the 2003 term, the fiftieth anniversary edition of Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution is an essential resource for law students, lawyers, and everyone interested in our nation''s Constitution. |
จากด้านในหนังสือ
ผลการค้นหา 1 - 5 จาก 37
หน้า xii
... Ratification of the Constitution The Amending Process 190 Hollingsworth v . Virginia ( 1798 ) 190 National Prohibition Cases ( 1920 ) 190 Hawke v . Smith ( 1920 ) 192 Dillon v . Gloss ( 1921 ) 193 Coleman v . Miller ( 1939 ) 194 7 ...
... Ratification of the Constitution The Amending Process 190 Hollingsworth v . Virginia ( 1798 ) 190 National Prohibition Cases ( 1920 ) 190 Hawke v . Smith ( 1920 ) 192 Dillon v . Gloss ( 1921 ) 193 Coleman v . Miller ( 1939 ) 194 7 ...
หน้า 22
... Labor Standards Act of 1938 , reversed Hammer . Darby obviated the need for the proposed child labor amendment submitted to the states in 1924. It has never been ratified . Stafford v . Wallace , 258 U.S. 495 ; 42 22 Chapter One.
... Labor Standards Act of 1938 , reversed Hammer . Darby obviated the need for the proposed child labor amendment submitted to the states in 1924. It has never been ratified . Stafford v . Wallace , 258 U.S. 495 ; 42 22 Chapter One.
หน้า 77
... ratification give no indication that the Framers intended for the states to add to constitutionally specified quali- fications . The debates did evince the " egalitarian ideal -- that election to the National Legislature should be open ...
... ratification give no indication that the Framers intended for the states to add to constitutionally specified quali- fications . The debates did evince the " egalitarian ideal -- that election to the National Legislature should be open ...
หน้า 78
... ratification debates does not show that the Framers opposed the imposition of additional state qualifications but only that they were silent on the subject . Early practice shows that some states actually implemented additional quali ...
... ratification debates does not show that the Framers opposed the imposition of additional state qualifications but only that they were silent on the subject . Early practice shows that some states actually implemented additional quali ...
หน้า 91
... ratified " by President Reagan , that obligated the United States to terminate all legal proceedings in U.S. courts involving Iran and to bring about the termi- nation of such claims through arbitration in an Iran - U.S . Claims Tri ...
... ratified " by President Reagan , that obligated the United States to terminate all legal proceedings in U.S. courts involving Iran and to bring about the termi- nation of such claims through arbitration in an Iran - U.S . Claims Tri ...
ฉบับอื่นๆ - ดูทั้งหมด
Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution Joseph Francis Menez,John R. Vile ชมบางส่วนของหนังสือ - 2004 |
คำและวลีที่พบบ่อย
action African American applied argued in dissent Article authority basis Bill of Rights Black Board Brennan California Chief Justice Circuit Court citizens civil claim commerce clause concurring Congress congressional constitutionality contract convicted Court held Court of Appeals criminal decision Decision-Yes denied discrimination due process clause election Eleventh Amendment enforce equal protection clause establishment clause executive exercise fact Facts-In Facts-The Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Fourth Amendment freedom governmental granted guaranteed immunity individual interest interstate commerce involving issue judge judicial jurisdiction jury legislation legislature liberty limited ment national government O'Connor opinion person police political president prohibited punishment question Question-Does racial ratified Reasons-C.J. Reasons-J regulate Rehnquist religion religious rule Scalia School District Section Senate speech statute Stevens suit Tenth Amendment tion trial U.S. Constitution U.S. District Court U.S. Supreme Court unconstitutional United upheld violation Virginia vote York