ภาพหน้าหนังสือ
PDF
ePub

THE REGARD FOR TRUTH AND GOOD FAITH (concluded)

Explanation of the moral ideas concerning truthfulness and good faith, pp. 109

-131.-When detected a deception implies a conflict between two irreconcil-

able ideas, which causes pain, p. 109.-Men like to know the truth, p. 109 sq.

-The importance of knowing the truth, p. 110.—Deception humiliating,

ibid.-A lie or breach of faith held more condemnable in proportion to the

magnitude of the harm caused by it, ibid.—The importance of truthfulness and

fidelity even in apparently trifling cases, p. 110 sq.-Deceit held permis-

sible or obligatory when promoting the true interest of the person subject to it,

p. III. The moral valuation of an act of falsehood influenced by its motive,

p. III sq.-The opinion that no motive can justify an act of falsehood, p. 112.

-Why falsehood is held permissible, or praiseworthy, or obligatory, when

directed against a stranger, ibid.-Deceit condemned as cowardly, p. 113.-

A clever lie admired or approved of, p. 114.-The duties of sincerity and good

faith to some extent founded on prudential considerations, pp. 114-124.-

Lying attended with supernatural danger, ibid.—A mystic efficacy ascribed

to the untrue word, pp. 116-118.-The efficacy of oaths and the methods of

charging them with supernatural energy, pp. 118-122.-Oaths containing

appeals to supernatural beings, pp. 120-122.-By being frequently appealed

to in oaths a god may come to be looked upon as a guardian of veracity

and good faith, p. 123.-The influence of oath-taking upon veracity,

p. 123 sq.-The influence of education upon the regard for truth, p. 124.-

The influence of habit upon the regard for truth, p. 125.-Natural to speak

the truth, p. 125 sq.-Intercourse with strangers destructive to savage veracity,

pp. 126-129.-Social incoherence apt to lead to deceitful habits, p. 129.-

Social differentiation a cause of deception, p. 129 sq.-Oppression an induce-

ment to falsehood, p. 130 sq.-The duty of informing other persons of the

truth, p. 131.-The regard for knowledge, pp. 131-136.

The regard for other persons' happiness in general, p. 153 sq.-The moral ideas

concerning conduct which affects other persons' welfare influenced by the

relationship between the parties, pp. 154-166.—The feeling of gratitude said

to be lacking in many uncivilised races, pp. 155-157.-Criticism of statements

to this effect, pp. 157-161.-Savages described as grateful for benefits bestowed

on them, pp. 161-165.-Gratitude represented as an object of praise or its

absence as an object of disapproval, p. 165 sq.-Why ungratefulness is

disapproved of, p. 166.—The patriotic sentiment defined, p. 167.—Though

hardly to be found among the lower savages, it seems to be far from unknown

among uncultured peoples of a higher type, p. 167 sq.-Many of the elements

out of which patriotism proper has grown clearly distinguishable among savages,

even the lowest, pp. 168-172.-National conceit, pp. 170-174.-The relation

between the national feeling and the religious feeling, p. 174 sq.-The

patriotism of ancient Greece and Rome, p. 175 sq.-The moral valuation of

patriotism, p. 176.-Duties to mankind at large, pp. 176-179.—The ideal of

patriotism rejected by Greek and Roman philosophers, p. 177 sq.-By

Christianity, p. 178 sq.-The lack of patriotism and national feeling during

the Middle Ages, pp. 179-181.-The development of the national feeling in

England, p. 181 sq.-In France, p. 182.-The cosmopolitanism of the

eighteenth century, p. 182 sq.-European patriotism after the French revolu

tion, p. 183 sq.-The theory of nationalism, p. 184.-The cosmopolitan

spirit, p. 184 sq.

The gluttony of savages and their views on it, p. 290 sq.-At higher stages of

culture intemperance often subject to censure, p. 291.-Views on pleasures of

the table, p. 291 sq.-Fasting as a means of having supernatural converse or

acquiring supernatural powers, p. 292 sq.-Abstinence from food before or

in connection with the performance of a magical or religious ceremony,

pp. 293-298.-Fasting prevents pollution, pp. 294-296.-Sacrificial victims

should be clean, and may therefore have to fast, p. 295 sq.-Fasting before

the performance of a sacrifice may be due to the idea that it is dangerous or

improper for the worshipper to partake of food before the god has had his

share, pp. 296-298.-Fasting after a death, pp. 298-308.-Observed only in

the daytime, p. 299 sq.-Abstinence from certain victuals only, pp. 300–302.

-Various attempts to explain the custom of fasting after a death, p. 302 sq.-

Mourners fast for fear of being polluted by the food, pp. 303-306.-Or

because they, by eating a piece of food, might pollute all victuals belonging

to the same species, p. 306 sq.-Or because they are supposed to be in a

delicate condition imposing upon them restrictions in their diet, p. 307 sq.-

Or because grief is accompanied by a loss of appetite, p. 308.-The Lent fast,

p. 308 sq.-Fasts connected with astronomical changes, pp. 309-315.-Among

the Jews, pp. 310-312.-Among the Harranians and Manichæans, p. 312 sq.-

The Muhammedan fast of Ramadân, pp. 313-315.-Fasting as a form of

penance, pp. 315-318.-As a survival of an expiatory sacrifice, pp. 316-318.-

Fasting and almsgiving, ibid.-Fasting "the beginning of chastity," p. 318.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

Certain kinds of food forbidden to certain classes of persons, pp. 319-324.-

To young persons, p. 319 sq.-To women, p. 320 sq.-To men, p. 321 sq.

-To priests or magicians, p. 322.- Restrictions in diet connected with

totemism, p. 323 sq.-Abstinence from animals which excite disgust by their

appearance, p. 324 sq.-From reptiles, p. 324.-From fish, p. 324 sq.-From

fowl, p. 325.-From eggs, p. 325 sq.-From milk, ibid.-From animals which

are regarded with disgust on account of their filthy habits or the nasty food

on which they live, pp. 326-328.-From pork, ibid.-From foreign animals,

p. 327. From animals which are supposed to be metamorphosed ancestors or

which resemble men, p. 328 sq.-From animals which excite sympathy, pp.

329-331-From beef, p. 330 sq.-Restrictions in diet due to the disinclina-

tion to kill certain animals for food or, generally, to reduce the supply of a

certain kind of victuals, pp. 330-332.-Abstinence from domestic animals

which are regarded as sacred, p. 331 sq.-From food which is believed to

injure him who partakes of it, pp. 332-334.-The sources to which the

general avoidance of certain kinds of food may be traced, p. 334 sq.-The

moral disapproval of eating certain kinds of food, p. 335.-The moral prohibi-

tion sanctioned by religion, ibid.-Vegetarianism, pp. 335-338.-Among many

peoples drunkenness so common that it can hardly be looked upon as a vice,

Pp. 338-341.-Sobriety or total abstinence from intoxicating liquors insisted

upon by Eastern religions, p. 341 sq.-Explanation of the moral ideas con-

cerning drunkenness and the use of alcoholic drink, pp. 342-345.-Wine or

spirituous liquor inspires mysterious fear, p. 344 sq.-The Muhammedan

prohibition of wine, p. 345.

CLEANLINESS AND UNCLEANLINESS-ASCETICISM IN GENERAL

« ก่อนหน้าดำเนินการต่อ
 »