Fig. 18. may be considered as infinite. Thus it appears that in each case the true value of the fraction depends only on A and A', the first terms of the series. The following rule is applicable to every function that can appear under the indeterminate form Find the first term of each of the ascending series which express the developements of the numerator and denominator when a+h is substituted in them instead of x. Reduce the new function formed of these first terms to its most simple form, and make ho; the results shall be the different values of the proposed function when x is made equal to a. Example. Suppose the function to be √x−√ a+ √(x—a) which, when x=ɑ, becomes - By substituting ath h 24/0 minator ✅✔✅24h + 2/20 term of each series, we have + &c. and the deno Direct Let a thread be fastened to it at H, and made to pass 94. From this mode of conceiving the curve to be generated, we may draw the following conclusions. 1st. Suppose PC to be a portion of the thread detached from the evolute, then PC will be a tangent to the evolute at C. a 2dly. The line PC will be perpendicular to a tangent to the curve FAP at the point P, or will be normal to the curve at that point. For the point P may be considered as describing at the same time an element of the curve FAP, and an element of a circle 9 Pq', whose momentary centre is C, and which has PC for its radius. 3dly. That part of the curve between F and P, which is described with radii all of which are shorter than CP, is more incurvated than a circle described on C as a centre, with a radius equal to CP. And in like manner PP', the part of the curve on the other side of P, which is described with radii greater than PC, is less incurvated than that circle. 4thly. The circle q P q' has the same curvature as the curve APP' itself has at P: hence it is called an EQUICURVE circle, and its radius PC is called the RADIUS of CURVATURE at the point C. 95. We are now to investigate how the radius of curvature at any point in FAP any proposed curve may be found. Let AB and BP be the co-ordinates at P any point in the curve, and PC its radius of curvature; and let PC meet AB in E. Put the abscissa AB, the ordinate BP=y, the arch AP=x, the angle AFP (that is, the arch which measures that angle, radius being unity) v, the radius of curvature PC=r. Take P another point in the curve, and let P'C' be the radius of curvature at that point. Let P'C' meet AB in E', and PC in D, and on D as a centre, with a radius=1, describe an arch of a circle, meeting the radii PC, P'C' in m and n. Then the arch PP' will be the increment of %; and since the angle PDP' is the difference of the angles PEA, P'E'A, the arch mn will be the corresponding increment of v. Suppose now the point P' to approach continually to P, then the points C and D will approach to C, and the ratio of the arch PP', the increment of z, to the +&c. Taking now the first arch m n the increment of v, will approach to the ratio of CP to Cm, that is to the ratio of r to I; therefore or r limit of m n and passing to the ratio of the ย thus we have obtained a formula ex pressing the radius of curvature, by means of the fluxion 93. Let HC'CF represent a material curve, or mould. abscissas. We proceed to deduce from this formula and v (§ 63.), therefore y =*/(4x+a), and, putting r a/ and, putting for the radius of 3 (a + 4x) -xy 24/a If in this general expression, we put x=o, we find Ex. 2. Suppose the curve to be an ellipse, required Putting a and c to denote the two axes, the equation c2 2 a1y .. ·y= by substituting the values of y and y, become *ལྤ (§ 39.), and sub the value last found for ty therefore, stituting this value of i in it becomes (a-2x)+4(ax-x2) 4(ax—x3) √(ax—xa) √ (c*a*+ (a°—c®) (4ax—4x2) We shall now apply these formula to some examples. which expression, when x=0, becomes simply 98. Example 1.-It is required to find the general expression for the radius of curvature of a parabola. The equation of the parabola is y=a* x3, there curvature at the vertices of the conjugate axis. PART Inverse Method. PART II. THE INVERSE METHOD OF FLUXIONS. 99. AS the DIRECT METHOD of fluxions treats of finding the relation between the fluxions of variable quantities, having given the relation subsisting between the quantities themselves; so the INVERSE METHOD treats of finding the relation subsisting between the variable quantities, having given the relation of their fluxions. Whatever be the relation between variable quantities, we can in every case assign the relation of their fluxions; therefore the direct method of fluxions may in this respect be considered as perfect. But it is not the same with the inverse method, for there are no direct and general rules, by which we can in every case determine, from the relation of the fluxions, that of their flowing quantities or fluents. All we can do is to compare any proposed fluxion with such fluxions as are derived from known fluents by the rules of the direct method, and if we find it to have the same form as one of these, we may conclude that the fluents of both, or at least the variable parts of these fluents, are identical. 100. In the direct method we have shewn, that by proper transformations, the finding of the fluxion of any proposed function is reducible to the finding of the fluxions of a few simple functions, and of the sums, or products, or quotients of such functions. In like manner, in the inverse method we must endeavour to transform complex fluxionary expressions into others more simple, so as to reduce them, if possible, to some fluxion, the fluent of which we already know. SECT. I. Of the Fluents of Fluxions involving one variable quantity. cording to the general formula y= a(*°—6°), _a(1—1) = 0, O but from this expression it is manifest, that nothing can be concluded. The value a(x2+1_b"+1) of the function in the particular case n+i of n+10 may be found by the rule given in § 90 for determining the value of a function when it assumes the form; but it may be otherwise found by pro ceeding thus. Put n+1=m, and let p= log.b ; then, by the formula of § 54, and therefore 733 Inverse Method. So, on the contrary, if we have any fluxional equation Inverte of this last form, we may conclude that 106. It is often convenient to denote the fluent of a derstood the fluent of a x" x; and as this fluent has been This expression which we have found for the value +C, we may express this conclusion Method. (ax+b)m+8 na(m+1) +C. place, we remark that the greatest exponent of the Inverse powers of x in the numerator may be supposed to be Method. less than that of its powers in the denominator. For if it were not so, by dividing U by V, and calling Q the quotient, and R the remainder, we should have Rx and U v=Qx+ V Rx |