INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE. See Aliens, 1-2; Bank-
ruptcy, 1; Communications Act; Constitutional Law, I, 3; VII,
3, 5; Contracts; Federal Water Power Act, 2; Jurisdiction,
I, 1; III, 1; Labor, 1; Mails; Transportation; Wages.

ADMIRALTY. See also Longshoremen's Act.

1. Shipowners Liability-Injuries aboard ship.-Judgment against
shipowner affirmed. Alaska S. S. Co. v. Petterson, 396.

2. Liability-Limitation-Insurers.-Suit against insurers, under
Louisiana law, remanded to be continued until conclusion of proceed-
ing by owner and charterer for limitation of liability. Maryland
Casualty Co. v. Cushing, 409.

AD VALOREM TAX. See Constitutional Law, VI, 3.

ADVERTISING. See Communications Act; Constitutional Law,
II, 2.

AGRICULTURE. See Transportation.

AIDERS AND ABETTORS. See Criminal Law, 1.

AIRLINES. See Constitutional Law, VI, 3; Mails.
AIR MAIL. See Mails..

ALABAMA. See Constitutional Law, I, 1.

ALASKA. See Jurisdiction, I, 1.

ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. See Trading with the Enemy
Act.

ALIENS. See also Constitutional Law, I, 3; Evidence, 6; Juris-
diction, I, 1; Trading with the Enemy Act.

1. Deportation-Sentences for crimes-Filipinos.-Filipino who
was born a national and came to United States as national, before
Philippine Independence Act, not deportable as alien who "after
entry" had been sentenced for crimes involving moral turpitude.
Barber v. Gonzales, 637.

2. Deportation-Suspension-Procedure.-Deportable alien
titled in habeas corpus proceeding to show that Board of Immigration
Appeals prejudged application for suspension of deportation under
1917 Act; if successful, new hearing before Board should be ordered;
1948 application for suspension of deportation governed by 1917
rather than 1952 Act. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 260.

AMORTIZATION. See Federal Water Power Act, 2.
ANTITRUST ACTS. See also Judgments; Procedure, 2–3.

1. Sherman Act-Civil actions-Sufficiency of complaint.-Gov-
ernment complaint charging combination and conspiracy to restrain
competition among local contractors which effected restraint of inter-
state commerce, stated cause of action under Act. United States v.
Employing Plasterers Assn., 186; United States v. Employing Lathers
Assn., 198.

2. Sherman Act-Conspiracy-Evidence.-Insufficiency of evidence
of conspiracy to restrain and monopolize sale of milk in Chicago area.
United States v. Borden Co., 514.

3. Sherman Act-Labor unions-Clayton Act.-Labor union not
immune under § 20 of Clayton Act for violation of Sherman Act by
combining with business contractors to suppress competition among
them. United States v. Employing Plasterers Assn., 186.

4. Clayton Act-Price discrimination-Injunctive, relief.-District
Court abused discretion in refusing Government injunctive relief
against proved violations of Clayton Act solely because defendants
were enjoined by prior decree of that court in private action. United
States v. Borden Co., 514.

5. Decrees-Findings-Evidence.-Findings and evidence sup-
ported decree of District Court. United Shoe Machinery Corp. v.
United States, 521.

APPEAL. See Jurisdiction; Procedure.

APPORTIONMENT. See Constitutional Law, VI, 3; VII, 6.
ARIZONA. See Procedure, 4.

ARKANSAS. See Constitutional Law, II, 3.

ARMED SERVICES PROCUREMENT ACT. See Constitutional

Law, II, 3.

ART. See Copyrights.

ATTORNEY GENERAL. See Aliens, 1-2; Trading with the
Enemy Act.

ATTORNEYS.

Disbarment-Federal court-Propriety.-Permanent disbarment
unnecessarily severe for misconduct shown by record in this case.
Sacher v. Association of the Bar, 388.

BANKRUPTCY.

1. Railroad reorganizations-Powers of I. C. C.-Forced merger.-
I. C. C. without power under § 77 to initiate and submit to district

BANKRUPTCY-Continued.

court a plan of reorganization which would compel merger of debtor
with another railroad; purpose of "consistency clause." St. Joe
Paper Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 298.

2. Railroad reorganizations.-Memorandum of DOUGLAS, J., on
denial of rehearing. St. Joe Paper Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.,
980.

BANKS. See Constitutional Law, II, 2; Criminal Law, 1; Trading
with the Enemy Act.

BAR ASSOCIATIONS. See Attorneys.

BENEFITS. See Longshoremen's Act.

BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS. See Aliens, 2.

BROADCASTING. See Communications Act.

CALIFORNIA. See Constitutional Law, IV, 2; VII, 10; Evidence,
3; Procedure, 4.

CARRIERS. See Bankruptcy, 1-2; Constitutional Law, VI, 1–3;
Transportation.

CASE OR CONTROVERSY. See Jurisdiction, I, 1-2.

CERTIORARI. See Jurisdiction, II, 1.

CHANCE. See Communications Act.

CHARTER. See Admiralty, 2.

CHECKS. See Criminal Law, 1.

CHICAGO. See Antitrust Acts.

CHIEF JUSTICE. See Supreme Court, 1.

CITIES. See Constitutional Law, VII, 7; VIII, 3; Priority.

CITIZENSHIP. See Aliens.

CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD. See Mails.

CLASSIFICATION. See Constitutional Law, I, 2-3; VIII, 1-3.

CLAYTON ACT. See Antitrust Acts, 3-4; Judgments.

COERCION. See Constitutional Law, VII, 9.

COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. See Judgments.

COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. See Labor, 1.

COMBINATION. See Antitrust Acts, 1-3.

COMMERCE. See Antitrust Acts; Bankruptcy; Constitutional
Law, VI; Criminal Law, 1; Gas; Jurisdiction, III, 1; Trans-
portation.

COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS. See Constitutional Law, II, 1;
VII, 5; Evidence, 1.

COMMUNICATIONS ACT.

-

Regulations Validity Giveaway programs.-Federal Com-
munications Commission regulations banning radio and television
"giveaway" programs invalid; such programs not crime under 18
U. S. C. § 1304; contribution of money or other valuable considera-
tion by contestants as essential element of offense under 18 U. S. C.
§ 1304. Federal Communications Comm'n 'v. American Broadcasting
Co., 284.

COMMUNISM. See Attorneys; Constitutional Law, VII, 3, 5;
Evidence, 6.

COMPACTS. See Constitutional Law, I, 4.

COMPENSATION. See Admiralty; Longshoremen's Act.

COMPETITION. See Antitrust Acts.

COMPLAINT. See Antitrust Acts, 1; Procedure, 2.

CONFESSIONS. See Constitutional Law, VII, 9.

CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS. See Evidence, 4.

CONGRESS. See Constitutional Law, I, 1-3; II, 1-2; III; VII,
1-3, 5; Evidence, 1.

CONNECTICUT. See Jurisdiction, I, 2; Priority.

CONSIDERATION. See Communications Act.

"CONSISTENCY CLAUSE." See Bankruptcy, 1.

CONSOLIDATION. See Bankruptcy, 1.

CONSPIRACY. See Antitrust Acts, 1-3; Constitutional Law, V;
Criminal Law, 1; Judgments.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. See also Evidence, 5; Jurisdiction, I,
1-2; II, 4-5.

I. In General, p. 1029.

II. Federal-State Relations, p. 1029.

III. Freedom of Speech, Press and Petition, p. 1029.

IV. Search and Seizure, p. 1029.

V. Double Jeopardy, p. 1030.

VI. Commerce, p. 1030.

VII. Due Process of Law, p. 1030.

VIII. Equal Protection of Laws, p. 1031.

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.

I. In General.

1. Powers of Congress-Property of United States-Disposition.-
Submerged Lands Act of 1953 constitutional. Alabama v. Texas,
272.

2. Powers of Congress-Regulation of lobbying-Validity.-Con-
struction and validity of Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act.
United States v. Harriss, 612.

3. Powers of Congress-Aliens-Deportation.-Internal Security
Act of 1950, § 22, authorizing deportation of alien who after entry
had been member of Communist Party, valid; ex post facto clause
of Constitution inapplicable to deportation of aliens. Galvan v.
Press, 522.

4. Compacts between states-Waterfront labor-Police power.—
Validity of New York-New Jersey Waterfront Commission Compact.
Linehan v. Waterfront Comm'n, 439.

II. Federal-State Relations.

1. Powers of Congress-Evidence in criminal cases-State courts.—
18 U. S. C. § 3486, construed as rendering testimony of witness
summoned before congressional committee inadmissible in prosecu-
tion of him in state court, valid. Adams v. Maryland, 179.

2. State regulation-National banks-"Savings."-New York law
forbidding national banks to use the word "saving" or "savings" in
their business or advertising, invalid as in conflict with federal laws;
Federal Reserve Act, § 24, construed. Franklin National Bank v.
New York, 373

3. State taxation-Sovereign immunity-Government contracts.-
Arkansas Gross Receipts Tax unconstitutional as applied to pur-
chases by contractor for use in construction for United States under
contract pursuant to Armed Services Procurement Act. Kern-
Limerick, Inc. v. Scurlock, 110.

III. Freedom of Speech, Press and Petition.

Lobbying-Regulation-Validity.-Federal Regulation of Lobby-
ing Act, as construed, not violative of First Amendment rights;
unnecessary to pass on question of validity of penalty provision in
§ 310 (b). United States v. Harriss, 612.

IV. Search and Seizure.

1. Admissibility of evidence-Federal courts.-Evidence of unlaw-
fully seized narcotics admissible on cross-examination to impeach
defendant's credibility. Walder v. United States, 62.