 | United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 840 ˹éÒ
...Mr. Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies." Sound reason, as we think, constrains us to deny to a certificate of naturalization, procured ex parte... | |
 | 1920 - 496 ˹éÒ
...Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dlst. v. Superior Court of Tulare County, Cal., 187 Pac. 1056. 54. Res Judicata. — A fact distinctly put In issue and directly determined...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action. — Lyons v. Empire Fuel Co., MSCCA, 262... | |
 | 1900 - 2044 ˹éÒ
...UB, 168 US 1-48, 18 Snp. Ct. 27, it is said that: "The general principle announced In numerous eases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put...ground of recovery, cannot be disputed In a subsequent salt between the same parties or their privies: and, even if the second suit le for a different cause... | |
 | 1917 - 2042 ˹éÒ
...reference to which the adjudications in both extend, rrom this has arisen the rule of the Supreme Court that: "A right, question or fact, distinctly put In...competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot tie disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies ; and even if the second... | |
 | 1904 - 910 ˹éÒ
...subject of res judioata are reviewed by Mr. Justice Harían, and the general doctrine thus stated: "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or fheir privies; and even if the second suit is for 'a different cause of action, the right, question,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1912 - 838 ˹éÒ
...Mr. Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in...disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or then- privies." Sound reason, as we think, constrains us to deny to a certificate of naturalization,... | |
 | 1922 - 1158 ˹éÒ
...Southern Pacific Co. v. United States, 1C8 US 1, 18 Sup. Ct. 18, 42 L. Ed. 355, used this language: "The general principle announced in numerous cases...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, ав а ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1907 - 1350 ˹éÒ
...former action adversely to the plaintiff's contention In this ease, and therefore barred a recovery. "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in Issue,...jurisdiction as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed lu a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and, even if the second suit is for... | |
 | 1909 - 1320 ˹éÒ
...JUDICATA— MATTEBS IN ISSUE. A matter distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court o£ competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery cannot...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action. [Ed. Note.— For other cases, see Judgment,... | |
 | 1921 - 1204 ˹éÒ
...disputed In subsequent suit between same parties or their privies. Under the rule of res judicata, a right, question, or fact, distinctly, put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, and even if the... | |
| |
The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same... 
