COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. See Constitutional Law, I; II, 3;
III, 2–4; Jurisdiction, I, 3; Labor, 1-3.
COLLEGES. See Constitutional Law, IX, 3-4.
COMMERCE. See Antitrust Acts; Constitutional Law, I; II, 3;
VII; Eminent Domain, 1-2; Employers' Liability Act; Trans-
portation.
COMMISSIONS. See Antitrust Acts, 2.
COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES. See Consti-
tutional Law, V, 2-3; Contempt.
COMMON TRUST FUND. See Constitutional Law, VIII, 5;
Jurisdiction, V, 1.
COMMUNISTS. See Constitutional Law, I; V, 2-3; Contempt.
COMPENSATION. See Constitutional Law, VI; Eminent Domain.
COMPLAINT. See Jurisdiction, I, 1.
CONGRESS. See Constitutional Law, I; Contempt.
CONSENT TO SUIT. See Jurisdiction, II, 1.
CONSOLIDATIONS. See Transportation, 3.
CONSPIRACY. See Antitrust Acts.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. See also Contempt; Health; Juris-
diction, I, 1-3; II, 1-2; V, 1.
I. In General, p. 999.
II. Federal-State Relations, p. 999.
III. Freedom of Speech, p. 1000.
IV. Search and Seizure, p. 1000.
V. Jury Trial, p. 1000.
VI. Eminent Domain, p. 1001.
VII. Commerce, p. 1001.
VIII. Due Process of Law, p. 1002.
IX. Equal Protection of Laws, p. 1002.
Powers of Congress-Labor relations-Non-Communist affida-
vits. Constitutionality of non-Communist affidavit provision of
§ 9 (h) of National Labor Relations Act, as amended by Labor Man-
agement Relations Act, 1947. American Communications Assn. v.
Douds, 382; Osman v. Douds, 846.
II. Federal-State Relations.
1. Marginal sea-Paramount rights.-Rights of United States in
marginal sea paramount to rights of Louisiana and Texas. United
States v. Louisiana, 699; United States v. Texas, 707.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Contmued
2 bequests ti I nited States-Validity of state prohibition—Stre
may bar bequests to Tnited States by domiciliaries, though permitting
bequests to State or subdivisions; no distinction between realty and
personalty n violation of Supremacy Claust: right reserved by
Tenti. Amendment Inited States v Burnison. 87.
3 State labor lave-Confuct with federal iau-Strike-vote pro-
VISIOL of Michigan tabor mediation isw mvalid as I conflict WILL
federa w Auto Workers v. O'Brien, 454
1 Labor relations—Beucis—Validry of non-Communist af
Provision of §§ 1 of Nationa. Labor Relations Art as amended by
Labor Management Heations Art. 1947. American Communica-
tions Asst. v Douds, 352 Osmar v Douds, 646.
2 Peace'u picketing—Ir junction-State potry -State court -
Junction agams pearetu picketing to compe, hirmg of Negroes cor-
trary u stane policy agams: racial discrimination, valid Buches
Superior Court 460.
& Peacefu, picketmp—Ir junction—State policy -State coun -
Junction against peacefu picketing to rompe employer to sigt
contract which, contrary u state pobry, would coerce empOVERS"
choice of bargaming representative, vahd. Building Service Employ-
Pes ↑ Gazzam. 585
4. Feacețul picketing — İr nunctum. — Owner-operated business —
State court junction against peacežu, picketing to compe, unor shop
at place of business conducted by owner without employees vaic
Teamsters Thor ↑ Eanke. 470
1 Search withone vatanda—Incident: ti arrest-Reasonaïeness —
Search Withou Wartar of one-room office maiden: ut valc arrest jor
shif and possession of forged postage stampe, awful though therE
was ampe time it procure wartan"; evidence thereby obtumes 10-
missibie i federa courts Inned States & Fabmowiz 56
2 Search wathing warrant-Brath regulations—Inspertun, vi
buildings-Query whether Fouri Amendment barred beurt officer
from entering home without warrant te inspect for unsanitary cond-
Instrict of Corumba ▼ Late 1
1. Cari actions-Severi. Amenament requires jury trials on II
artone at law not applicable to equity sunt against State in Supreme
Court for junction and accounting Uned States ▼ LouisILDE
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.
2. Impartial jury-Government employees-Communist defend-
ant.-Communist on trial in District of Columbia for contempt of
House Committee on Un-American Activities not denied constitu-
tional right by presence of government employees on jury, absent
proof of actual bias. Dennis v. United States, 162.
3. Impartial jury-Government employees-Actual bias.-Trial
court's refusal to permit voir dire examination of government em-
ployees as to effect of Loyalty Order on ability to render impartial
verdict, denied opportunity to prove actual bias and vitiated con-
viction. Morford v. United States, 258.
1. Taking-Navigation improvement-Uplands impaired by under-
flow.-Destruction of agricultural value of uplands by underflow
resulting from maintenance of river continuously at ordinary high-
water mark was compensable taking, although for improvement of
navigation. United States v. Kansas City Ins. Co., 799.
2. Taking-Riparian rights-Reclamation project not navigation
control.-Friant Dam as reclamation project rather than navigation
control; landowners entitled to compensation for deprivation of
riparian rights to benefits from seasonal inundations; date from which
interest allowed; adequacy of description of interest taken. United
States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co., 725.
3. Just compensation - Wartime requisition-Ceiling price.-
O. P. A. ceiling price as just compensation for wartime requisition
of black pepper; "retention value" disallowed though owner was
"investor" rather than "trader"; cost to owner immaterial. United
States v. Commodities Trading Corp., 121.
4. Leaseholds-Just compensation-Removal expenses.-Removal
expenses not compensable where Government initially takes occu-
pancy for lesser period than leaseholder's term but subsequently
exhausts term by exercise of option to renew; when removal expenses
determinable. United States v. Westinghouse Co., 261.
1. Labor relations-Federal law-Non-Communist affidavits.—
Constitutionality of non-Communist affidavit provision of § 9 (h) of
National Labor Relations Act, as amended by Labor Management
Relations Act, 1947. American Communications Assn. v. Douds, 382;
Osman v. Douds, 846.
2. Labor relations-State laws-Conflict with federal law.-Strike-
vote provision of Michigan labor mediation law invalid as in conflict
with federal law. Auto. Workers v. O'Brien, 454.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.
3. State taxation-Motor vehicles.-Maryland title tax of 2% of
market value of motor vehicles, prerequisite to use of roads, valid as
applied to interstate carriers; not shown to be excessive. Capitol
Greyhound Lines v. Brice, 542.
VIII. Due Process of Law. See also III, supra.
1. Scope "Any person"-Nonresident enemy alien.-Nonresident
enemy aliens, captured and imprisoned abroad, without right to writ
of habeas corpus in United States court in wartime. Johnson v.
Eisentrager, 763.
2. Federal legislation-Vagueness-Validity.-Section 9 (h) of Na-
tional Labor Relations Act, as amended by Labor Management Rela-
tions Act, 1947, not void as vague. American Communications Assn.
v. Douds, 382.
3. Notice and hearing-Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act.-Validity of
multiple seizures provision of Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act; hearing
not essential in administrative determination of probable cause.
Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, 594.
4. State action.-Immaterial that policy of State is expressed by its
courts rather than by its legislature. Hughes v. Superior Court, 460.
5. State courts-Notice and hearing-Common trust funds.-Set-
tlement of accounts of common trust fund; validity of notice by
publication to beneficiaries. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank Co.,
306.
6. Blue Sky Law-Notice and hearing-Foreign association.-
Power of State to subject to jurisdiction of Commission in cease-and-
desist proceedings under Blue Sky Law foreign association issuing
certificates of insurance to residents; validity of service of process by
registered mail. Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia, 643.
7. Capital punishment-Insane persons.-Determination by Gov-
ernor, aided by physicians, that person under death sentence has not
become insane, valid; adversary hearing and judicial review not re-
quired. Solesbee v. Balkcom, 9.
8. Criminal cases-Right to counsel.-Petitioner failed to prove
such unfairness in non-capital prosecution as would justify Court in
voiding sentence. Quicksall v. Michigan, 660.
IX. Equal Protection of Laws.
1. Classification generally.-State may direct law against evil as it
actually exists without covering whole field of possible abuses.
Hughes v. Superior Court, 460.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued.
2. Racial discrimination-Grand jury.-State court conviction of
Negro for murder reversed because of racial discrimination in selection
of grand jury. Cassell v. Texas, 282.
3. Racial discrimination-State-supported schools.-Texas law
school for Negroes was not substantially equal; Negro entitled to
admission to University of Texas Law School. Sweatt v. Painter,
629.
4. Racial discrimination-State-supported schools. State pre-
cluded from segregating Negro admitted to University of Oklahoma
graduate school. McLaurin v. Oklahoma Regents, 637.
5. Testamentary gifts-Bequests to United States.-California law
banning bequests to United States by domiciliaries, though permitting
bequests to State or subdivisions, valid; not unconstitutional dis-
crimination against United States. United States v. Burnison, 87.
CONTEMPT. See also Constitutional Law, V, 2.
1. Congressional committee witness-Willful default-Lack of
quorum.-Conviction under R. S. § 102 for failure to produce records;
defense of lack of quorum unavailable; use of testimony of defaulting
witness not barred by R. S. § 859. United States v. Bryan, 323;
United States v. Fleischman, 349.
2. Congressional committee witness-Willful default-Member of
board.-Liability of member of executive board of association for
failure to produce records; subpoena valid though addressed to mem-
ber of board and not to the association; that association unincorpo-
rated immaterial; sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction.
United States v. Fleischman, 349.
CONTRACTS. See Constitutional Law, III, 3; VIII, 6; Jurisdic-
tion, I, 3; IV, 1; Labor, 3; Patents, 2.
CORPORATIONS. See Taxation.
COST. See Constitutional Law, VI, 3.
COST-PLUS CONTRACT. See Labor, 3.
COUNSEL. See Constitutional Law, VIII, 8.
COUNTY UNIT SYSTEM. See Jurisdiction, I, 1.
COURT OF CLAIMS. See Constitutional Law, VI; Eminent Do-
main, 1-2; Jurisdiction, II, 5-6.
COURTS-MARTIAL. See also Jurisdiction, II, 4; III, 3.
1. Appointment-Validity-Law member.-Construction of re-
quirement of 8th Article of War that officer of Judge Advocate Gen-
eral's Department be detailed as law member. Hiatt v. Brown, 103.
|