 | 1919 - 2026 ˹éÒ
...Schenck v. United States, 249 US 47, 39 Sup. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. (March 3, 1919), the court said : "The question In every case is whether the words used are used In such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present dan-' ger that they will bring about the substantive... | |
 | 1920 - 1058 ˹éÒ
...Holmes' conclusion in the Schenck Case, 249 US 47, 52, 39 Sup. Ct. 247, 249 (63 L. Ed. 470) : "The question In .every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring aliout the substantive... | |
 | 1920 - 1156 ˹éÒ
...Law, and concern' ing a prosecution under that act the Supreme Court of the united States said: "The question in every case is whether the words used are used in snch circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will... | |
 | 1920 - 1216 ˹éÒ
...speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting 'Fire !' in a theater and causing a panic. * * » The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such nature ая to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive... | |
 | Thomas Reed Powell - 1919 - 472 ˹éÒ
...constitutional rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstance* and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will '" (1919)... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1919 - 756 ˹éÒ
...words that may have all the effect of force. Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Co., 221 US 418, 439. The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that... | |
 | Scott Nearing - 1919 - 108 ˹éÒ
...rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. . . . The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." / That is the Debs decision. That is the method in which the Supreme Court handled... | |
 | Zechariah Chafee (Jr.) - 1919 - 54 ˹éÒ
...rights. But the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. . . . The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that... | |
 | Zechariah Chafee (Jr.) - 1919 - 40 ˹éÒ
...act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. * * * The question in every case is whettttr the words used are used in such circumstances and...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that... | |
 | Charles Ghequiere Fenwick - 1920 - 352 ˹éÒ
...arising out of a violation of the Espionage Act, Justice Holmes framed the issue as follows : " The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that... | |
| |
The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. 
