 | Dennis Brown - 2000 - 292 หน้า
...law and no culture' reminding us of Aristotle's comment that 'he who is unable to live in society or has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a God'. The median group, or 'band', emerges as a self-evident extension of the Foulkesian small group, facilitating... | |
 | Nigel Warburton, Jonathan E. Pike, Derek Matravers - 2000 - 416 หน้า
...and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole. But he who is unable to live in society or has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god: he is no part of a state.' (ibid.,1253a26-9,p.13). To be what he really is, man needs to reunite the... | |
 | W.E. Conklin - 2001 - 372 หน้า
...whose nature is to live with others" (IX, 9, 1 169b 18). As he puts it early in the Politics, "[b]ut he who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god: he is no part of a state" (I, 2, 1253a 27-28). Aristotle joins this determinative sense of physis with... | |
 | Tzvetan Todorov - 2001 - 196 หน้า
...so when joined and shared with a companion."18 Aristotle also left us this well-known formula: "But he who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god."19 Animals and gods are self-sufficient and therefore can be seen as alone. Man is irremediably... | |
 | Ian Watt - 2001 - 348 หน้า
...undoubtedly a distinctively modern culture-hero. Aristotle, for example, who thought that the man ' who is unable to live in society, or who has no need...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god',1 would surely have found Crusoe a very strange hero. Perhaps with reason; for it is surely true... | |
 | Chris Brown, Terry Nardin, Nicholas Rengger - 2002 - 634 หน้า
...when isolated, is not self-sufficing; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole. But he who is unable to live in society, or who has no...because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a 30 beast or a god: he is no part of a state. A social instinct is implanted in all men by nature, and... | |
 | Jonathan Haslam - 2002 - 278 หน้า
...Testament as against the harsh judgementalism of the Old. Aristotle argued that man was naturally sociable: "he who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient unto himself, must be either a beast or a god: he is no part of a state. A social instinct is implanted... | |
 | A. David Napier - 2010 - 344 หน้า
...than anyone else encouraged me to see this project to completion. Preface Nailed to the crossroads He who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god, —Aristotle, Poetics OUTSIDERS The Caribbean writer CLR James once said that "a man's unstated assumptions,... | |
 | Frederick Copleston - 2003 - 548 หน้า
...while the State is a self-sufficing whole, neither the individual nor the family are self-sufficient. "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god."' The Platonic-Aristotelian view of the State as exercising the positive function of serving the end... | |
 | Steven Stavropoulos - 2008 - 230 หน้า
...him. — Herodotus, Histories SOCIETY He who is unable to live in society or who has no need of it because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god. — Aristotle, Politics There is no greater evil than anarchy. — Sophocles, Antigone A state is strongest... | |
| |
But he who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god: he is no part of a state. 
