| Albert A. Anderson - 1997 - 208 ˹éÒ
...But this happens quite differently in the state than outside the state where no human beings dwell: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god: he is no part of a state."57 People express the universal (ta katholouf* through poetry. Unlike those... | |
| Torbjorn L. Knutsen, Torbjørn L. Knutsen - 1997 - 370 ˹éÒ
...of manin-isolation are misguided. Man, Aristotle emphasized, cannot exist outside a social context: 'He who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god.' Political theorists ever since have accepted Aristotle's argument that political actors are influenced... | |
| Jasper Ungoed-Tho - 1998 - 178 ˹éÒ
...communities. This view, for Western culture, originates with Aristotle (1905, p. 29) who considered that 'he who is unable to live in society, or who has no need to because he is sufficient to himself, must be either a beast or a God'. Rousseau shifted the emphasis... | |
| Cynthia A. Freeland - 2010 - 388 ˹éÒ
...naturally sociable, consistently asserted the social element of important aspects of the human self: But he who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god: he is no part of a state.89 There are numerous examples of Aristotle's position, and each one of them... | |
| Peter Loptson - 1998 - 588 ˹éÒ
...when isolated, is not self-sufficing; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole. But he who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god: he is no part of a state. A social instinct is implanted in all men by nature, and yet he who first... | |
| Connie Robertson - 1998 - 686 ˹éÒ
...preferred to improbable possibilities. 481 Pali tits Man is by nature a political animal. 482 7'ci/iriV.v olving year m 483 Politics Nature does nothing without purpose or uselessly. 484 Politics Where some people are very... | |
| Ben-Ami Scharfstein - 1998 - 710 ˹éÒ
..."finer and more godlike" than the pursuit of the good of the single man.84 He goes so far as to say that "he who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must either be a beast or a god: he is no part of a state."85 Yet Aristotle is pulled toward an ideal that... | |
| David L. Sills, Robert King Merton - 2000 - 466 ˹éÒ
...when isolated, is not self-sufficing; and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole. But he who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god: he is no part of a state. A social instinct is implanted in all men by nature, and yet he who first... | |
| David Willows, John Swinton - 2000 - 224 ˹éÒ
...when isolated, is not self-sufficing: and therefore he is like a part in relation to the whole. But he who is unable to live in society, or who has no...sufficient for himself must be either a beast or a God. (Book 1, chapter 2) The claim of Aristotle that it is impossible to regard man in isolation from his... | |
| Dennis Brown - 2000 - 292 ˹éÒ
...law and no culture' reminding us of Aristotle's comment that 'he who is unable to live in society or has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a God'. The median group, or 'band', emerges as a self-evident extension of the Foulkesian small group, facilitating... | |
| |