 | Richard A. Posner - 2009 - 428 หน้า
...protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater, and causing a panic."10 Speech may be punished when "the words used are used in such circumstances and...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent."" With the country at war, Congress had a legitimate and indeed urgent interest in... | |
 | Murray Dry - 2004 - 324 หน้า
...speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. . . . The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that... | |
 | Robert E. Denton - 244 หน้า
...protect a man from an injunction ugainst uttering words that may have all the effect of force. .. . The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that... | |
 | Joy Hakim - 2003 - 438 หน้า
...speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic.. . . The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such... | |
 | Jay Shafritz - 2004 - 319 หน้า
...theatre and causing a panic." Holmes created the test that has often been used in free-speech cases: "The question in every case is whether the words used are...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." client state I. A state the interests of which are subordinated to another states... | |
 | Geoffrey R. Stone - 2004 - 758 หน้า
...protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater, and causing a panic. . . . The question in everv case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. When a nation is at war many things that... | |
 | Donald P. Kommers, John E. Finn, Gary J. Jacobsohn - 2004 - 794 หน้า
...character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done. . . . ¡Thel question in ever}1 case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. It is a question of proximity and degree. As the following discussion shows, the... | |
 | David M. Kennedy - 2004 - 452 หน้า
...pamphlets urging potential army inductees to resist conscription. "The question," Holmes declared, "is whether the words used are used in such circumstances...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent."92 Schenck had clearly counseled illegal action, and thus would have been convicted... | |
 | Richard A. Posner - 2004 - 474 หน้า
...falsely shouting fire in a theater, and causing a panic."7 Speech may therefore be suppressed when "the words used are used in such circumstances and...bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent."8 With the country at war, Congress had a legitimate and indeed urgent interest in... | |
 | David L. Faigman - 2004 - 440 หน้า
...hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight." Holmes wrote that the "question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils... | |
| |
The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. 
