...are facts which cannot be disputed .... It is incredible that these facts should speak falsely. . . . The close resemblance of the embryo of man to that,...dog—the construction of his skull, limbs and whole frame on the same plane with that of other mammals—the occasional reappearance of various structures ....

...of form. Thus Darwin, in his "Descent of Man," says: "He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of Nature as disconnected, cannot...resemblance of the embryo of man to that, for instance, of a dog — the construction of his skull, limbs and whole frame on the same plan with that of other mammals...

...principle of evolution stands up clear and firm. ... He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot...that man is the work of a separate act of creation." Of the six principal systems of Hindu philosophy, the Sankhya and the Yoga systems, as stated above,...

...incredible that all these facts should speak falsely. He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot...resemblance of the embryo of man to that, for instance, of a dog — the construction of his skull, limbs, and whole frame, independently of the uses to which the...

...descended from some less highly organised form. . . . He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot...that man is the work of a separate act of creation. . . . [The facts] all point in the plainest manner to the conclusion that man is the co-descendant...

...evolutionary scheme. As Darwin rather bluntly put the point, "He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot...that man is the work of a separate act of creation" ([1871] 1952, 590). From a modern scientific perspective, humankind is not created imago dei and history...

...conclusion with considerably more substantive significance. "He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot...believe that man is the work of a separate act of creation."19 Newman would of course disagree on the substantive contention, but for both Darwin and...

...years later in 1871, that Darwin specifically stated, "He who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot...that man is the work of a separate act of creation. . . . [M]an is descended from some lowly organized form." To rub it in he wrote, "My object in this...

...Ellis agreed with Darwin's evolutionary theory that [h]e who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot...resemblance of the embryo of man to that, for instance, of a dog — the construction of the skull, limbs and whole frame on the same plan with that of other mammals,...

...distasteful" the thought of descent from simians, nevertheless, "he who is not content to look, like a savage, at the phenomena of nature as disconnected, cannot...that man is the work of a separate act of creation" (590). He admitted that his boast about the immense superiority of the human species had been tempered...